It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

300 Million Year Old U.F.O. Fossil??

page: 3
2
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 07:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Outrageo
No, metal cannot "fossilize".

ONLY previously organic matter can be fossilized - Animal bones & tissue, plants, sea shells.




Im not saying you are wrong, but is that just your opinion?

Where can I see proof of this that way I can get it off my mind.
Very willing to learn.



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 07:39 PM
link   
They are probably not anything alien. They are definately some interesting rocks that I have never seen before. But then you never know... I would like to know how they formed that way.



posted on Jun, 7 2007 @ 02:15 PM
link   

I don't think metal and such fossilize. Only organic matter does that.


Many UFOs include organic material in it for strenghening and assisting or either are organic.



posted on Jun, 7 2007 @ 03:36 PM
link   
Earth2, et al:

From the Experts:

Dr. Abedon's Fossil Page
CreationWiki on Fossilization
Columbia U on Fossils
a time-lapse animation of Fossilization
Easy explanation regarding Fossils/Fossilization fr. Science Clarified

Now - if someone were to suggest that this might be a "crystalized" rather than fossilized UFO...






posted on Jun, 7 2007 @ 03:46 PM
link   
Ya. I don't thing UFO's are so small. Teeny tiny little aliens. Don't think so my friend. I would chalk this one up to maybe ROCKS! Jees.



posted on Dec, 21 2008 @ 04:40 PM
link   



posted on Dec, 28 2008 @ 10:35 PM
link   



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 01:11 AM
link   
why sit here and argue about what it is??

why not split the rock open and have a look inside?

i think it would answer alot of questions

btw i do think it looks like a giant prehistoric clam , just my impressions lol



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 01:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by fishmaster
Ya. I don't thing UFO's are so small. Teeny tiny little aliens. Don't think so my friend. I would chalk this one up to maybe ROCKS! Jees.


look just because this is a rock, doesnt mean that there cannot be tiny aliens

just because you think its impossible doesnt mean anything, other than you need to think more critically

what, you thought all aliens were 5ft tall?

seirously, open the mind a bit?


i still think the photos show rocks but ill defend the philisophical possibility of tiny or giant aliens lol



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 01:17 AM
link   
reply to post by Fowl Play
 


To me they look a lot like smaller formations that I have seen in the GA/ALA area, caused by water erosion, but it could be any number of formations, I think the shape is coincidental.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 01:24 AM
link   
Looks to me like slurry/sludge deposits that dripped slowly and spread out to form the discus shaped objects.

Slurry and sludge from coal extraction was a mix of waste and water and commonly was moved by way of wooden gutters. Those would leak I'm sure and these look like the byproduct of leaking sludge/slurry runs.

Doubtful they are crafts of any kind.

Eventually all of the crap around the mines would be destroyed by weather post production.




top topics



 
2
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join