It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
WHOA!!!! I just looked over a file I got a few months ago (I can't remember where):
It is one second ahead of the .CSV that you're on about, and all the altitudes (barometric) are all 1 ft lower in this file than in the other. Why, if they're the same data source?
AA77 (and/or like models) do not have GPS. 'besides, all that's used for is the in flight map for the seats' -- host
Lat/Lon is by interia systems. The 20Minute NTSB error was discussed. Possible with violent airframe events to knock the interia out of sync. But this could not affect the entire flight. i.e. any violent movement can not error Lat/Lon data prior to itself. (unless it occurred in a previous flight, and was un-fixed for this flight) I couldn't map the corridantes right there, but they looked close. What a surprise this gave me later on.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Originally posted by nick7261
So the "raw" file and the csv file both originated with UnderTow, who did not provide the original data files, but instead provided admittedly edited data files.
Where's that admitted?
I'm trying to follow all this...
sorry for short posts today....
Originally posted by nick7261
to note that the csv file put out by undertow was NOT the actual, original file sent by the NTSB.
Again, I'm not saying undertow tampered with the data. However, the fact that he edited the file himself invalidates and certainty that the file and its contents originated at the NTSB.
IF undertow wanted to tamper with the data himself, he would have to cover up the change in the time and date stamp on the file that came from the NTSB. By editing the file himself, there is a built in explanation for the time and date stamp being different from the original time and date stamp sent by the NTSB.
Again, I'm not saying this is what happened.
I'm saying that undertow's admission that he edited the data file prevents any claim that the data as portrayed can be verfified as coming from the NTSB.
PS. I DO have teenage kids.
Originally posted by johndoex
MoD is starting to get it...
nicky.. you're not even close.. keep trying.
"Also, the animation was not sent to all of the FOIA requestors, but to only one individual. This leads me to believe that it was an inadvertent disclosure (or something else I won’t discuss at this time).
911files.info...
Originally posted by johndoex
Ok.. im gonna throw Nick some hints (notice i said Nick and not Nicky) since im starting to feel bad for him and he was rather pleasant in his last post...
Originally posted by nick7261
Also, if you didn't create your own animation from the csv files, what did you mean by "decode" the csv file? You referred to software to decode the csv file. What software did you use?
I also remember Craig saying something about you guys being excited about getting the csv file and that you were trying to decode it, but then the NTSB animation came which basically "decoded" the csv file for you. Is this correct?
Originally posted by johndoex
Originally posted by nick7261
Also, if you didn't create your own animation from the csv files, what did you mean by "decode" the csv file? You referred to software to decode the csv file. What software did you use?
I also remember Craig saying something about you guys being excited about getting the csv file and that you were trying to decode it, but then the NTSB animation came which basically "decoded" the csv file for you. Is this correct?
No thats not correct...
read again...
"an edited .csv file which was decoded from the .fdr file. "
"The NTSB released the FDR data AND the animation BEFORE we had obtained the citgo station witness accounts and BEF0RE we even made our first trip out to Arlington with Dylan and Russell.
And no they did not send them to Rob.
Rob and Merc were both Admins on the old Loose Change forum.
Chris (undertow) obtained the FDR data via FOIA and shortly after Calum Douglas (snowygrouch) obtained the animation.
Everyone was excited about the data but reserved because we knew it would take a while to decode it.
Originally posted by johndoex
So, we asked Boeing to decode the raw file...
So.. there you have it in a nut shell, the timeline, files, how they were obtained. the making of small video clips on youtube.. the introduction and reasons why to start questioning the flight path instead of thinking it was an error.. and the making of our film.
Geeeze. . i really hate typing..
Originally posted by nick7261
The thread Rob referred me to at P49T has a link to the files labeled "edited." The reason they gave was because they took out personal information like name, street address, etc.
This may very well be legitimate. However, it also is an important detail to note that the csv file put out by undertow was NOT the actual, original file sent by the NTSB.
Again, I'm not saying undertow tampered with the data. However, the fact that he edited the file himself invalidates and certainty that the file and its contents originated at the NTSB.
PS. I DO have teenage kids.
Originally posted by johndoex
Nick, what bothers me so much is that you did not contact us prior to your comments/claims. If you had, it would have never escalated.
Everything i have typed above can be found on our site in a simple radio interview download.
Does this mean i have to type this out for every Nick that comes along in the future when it is all readily available if people take the time to look for it and click some links? What would you do Nick? Would you ignore the next Nick? Or type all this out again for him...