It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by piacenza
I don't understand why its there (actually I think I do since I beleive those are bombs going off..) I circled it in red. Watch the video and pay attention to the puff; should it be there at that moment?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
The flash is most likely the static electricity jumping from the plane to the building. Planes build up a huge static charge when they're flying. Usually it discharges when they land. In this case when it got near the huge conductor (the WTC) it discharged from the nose into the building.
Originally posted by there is no god
Its just a puff as a window pane blew, it eventually comes part of the path of the fuel explosion. You CTers must look at every frame to find anomalies.
This is part of the problem I have with the 911 Cult theories (yes theories...plural). Why would an organisation (a contradictory term for a US Government or Administration body I know) spend the time to place loads of Thermite / Thermate / C4 / 4th Generation Micro-Nukes (delete as applicable to your particular theory:lol around a building and risk an impacting aircraft damaging the demo path?
Why not just blow the explosives and blame a massive security breach? They could state that they will never be able to ascertain what happened as the evidence would be "gone".
If the planes were a cover for a controlled demolition then why wait so long to finalise it? The ensuing fire could or would effect the demo path. Surely it should have been, plane hits and explosives go bang, maybe not instantaneously but certainly not many minutes later. Of course assuming they were real planes..there is a Cult theory they were holograms
As I see it, using planes to cover a "D" job over complicates the situation.
Much seems to be said that the so called "controlled demolition" was more perfect than any other CD. Straight down the footprint. Maybe, just maybe that's because it was not a CD.
To hear the 911 Cult spiel you would think sheeple like me are just saying "Ya boo sux to you". Hey I have read a lot of this Cult nonsense and I do not see things as the Cult does.
I am no fan of Bush, I am no real fan of America generally, imperialism dressed as capitalisation, imho. Look at what they done to Japan post WW2. If it wasn't for the language on the sign boards you would think you were in the US when in Tokyo. I would love to see any great American "administration" humbled, proved to be wrong, caught in the act but it ain't 911.
911 will lead ultimately to Americas fall from being the only world superpower imho. The disastrous Iraq fiasco has removed from the minds of the World anything that was left of Americas "can do anything" ability that was left after 911. Empires always fall, history shows it. None of those Empires saw their fall coming.
I am often amused by the term "United States". A country of religious, moral, social and many, many other contradictions. It is probably fitting that there are even contradictions in the perceived events of 911. Enough for a whole new cult
It is not so much "a" conspiracy theory as a Multi-Choice Question paper.
1) The Towers were hit by:
a) No Planes?
b) Holographic Planes?
c) Real Planes piloted by remote control, after the passengers were disembarked and given new identities?
d) Real Planes piloted by remote control, after the passengers were disembarked and murdered?
2) The cause of the Towers collapse was:
a) Thermite / Thermate controlled demolition?
b) Good old fashioned explosives carefully placed "secretly"?
c) 4th Generation micro-nukes?
d) The Big bad Wolf blew too hard?
Which are the right answers?
No doubt loads of dodgy video and graphics to follow in response!! I wouldn't bother I have read most of it and having an independent mind came to a different conclusion. Sorry if that makes me a "Sheeple", but at least I am not a cult member.