It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
MOSCOW - Former President Boris Yeltsin, who engineered the final collapse of the Soviet Union and pushed Russia to embrace democracy and a market economy, has died, a Kremlin official said Monday. He was 76.
Originally posted by maestro46
Sad that this is the discussion we're having in a thread about a dead Yeltsin but very well.
Ok...befor anything else is said - answer these questions in your next reply.
1. When was the last time that the US has established bases near Russia since the cold war period?
2. Why ask Russia to participate in this missile defense system?
3. Who is this missile defense system protecting and against who (this question is kinda related to the one above)?
4. What was the sole purpose for the creation of NATO?
5. Again, how would you feel if Russian S-300s were right under your border?
6. Did I say this was a version of the Cuban missile crisis?
Quick comment - ask any tactician, he'll tell you that the best defense you can have is a good offense. So rendering Russian balistic missiles useless would be a strategic offensive move (this is not an act of war). That is why it is a threat.
Regards,
Maestro
[edit on 23-4-2007 by maestro46]
[edit on 23-4-2007 by maestro46]
Originally posted by maestro46
- Now the bases you have just listed are minor, you know this. Niether are they in any way a threat. Mind you Afghanistan Bosnia, and Kosovo are not close to Russia unless you're looking at a very small map.
- Russia could be threatened by terrorist org.s? I'm sorry is this acknowlegement I hear? Pal while the world was swept by a wave of terrorism in 2000 Russia was already on this front in the late 90s. And yes, I do mean chechnya. No, the motives of this war were not anti-terrorism, but the conflict spawned alot of it. And mind you Chechen terrorists are regarded as rebels, freedom fighters, and good people over all by alot of the western media. Not to mention they do not fall into the list of known terrorist org.s with the US or UK. This did start to change after Beslan, but not a whole lot. So try to tell me that the US is aiming to work together against terrorism with Russia by building an anti-balistic missile defense in eastern europe. Does that even make sense? I mean that could be your opinion on the matter but it's certainly no fact. And when was the last time terrorists used balistic missiles?
- Mate both Iran and NK use Ruski tech (and some of their own ofcourse). If the US has ever felt a missile threat from any country in the world it was the USSR, and now Russia. Why? Cause we are one of the few countries with good enough missiles and enough warheads to match the US. It's not NK, it's not Iran. Furthermore we're not certain of nukes in Iran and NK is under close watch by the US AND CHINA. You wanna go to war over imaginary nukes like in Iraq where the invasion was about imaginary WMDs? Stressing it again, any significant and real threat to the US comes from the Ruski missiles. Ruskies don't have to even be agressive in this case. Just possesing these missiles is enough. Same as the brits never wanted anyone to match their navy. This entire paragraph I'm trying to make it clear to you that this move is in fact directed against Russia as I explained in my comment in the previous post.
- Exactly, and now since there is no USSR what is left is Russia. It takes all the blame for the USSR, and sometimes all the credit despite the fact that many republics were once part of it and it's leaders weren't always Russia. Nonetheless Russia is now what NATO is keeping checked at all times. Russia is now the potential threat to Europe now that it's econ and military is rising. Like I said befor, they do not have to flex their muscles or be agressive; just matching someone in military strength and econ is enough to worry them. So why would Russia be participating in a military project which neutralizes thier missile offensive capabilities again?
- Suspicion is not in question. Alright, I guess you just don't get what I'm asking here. Just tell me have you lived outside the US ever? Not even necissarily that but ever even tried to look at it's foreign policies from a different perspective? I suppose the easiest way to ask this question is how would you feel if some other different country was countering, blocking, or preventing in certain ways the capabilities of your country. I doubt you would be happy (i'm not even talking military wise here).
- again, see the very last part of my previous post.
Regards,
Maestro
Originally posted by maestro46
Check my thread here;
www.abovepolitics.com...
pages 3-5 should give you teh best outline. It has some mention of this treaty. US intentions are very different from what you might think (that's only my opinion).
You're no longer trained to fight Russians because the country is in ruins compared to it's old state. The military is in a mess. Then there's chechnya. The US knows they don't have to worry about the ruski tanks now. Which leaves only ABMs for Russia to go on the offensive with...for now.
Russia and the US would accomplish alot...I can't see them working together fully hand in hand ever however. The entire goverments of both sides would have to do a 180% turn. That and they're both superpowers. Russia is comming back to that status. There's no room in the world for 2 superpowers. Not saying they'll kill each other but they will always be stepping on each other's interests one way or another. As for US relations with any country atm...I think bush did a great job of creating a lovely image of america to the world. It will take some time to fix the damage he cause to the name of the US.
I fail to see how an ABM shield would prevent an invasion into Iran.
Afghanistan is a conflict zone...correct me if I'm wrong, I wouldn't know how hostile it really is. Bulgaria - thanks for the info.
I'm glad you agree on the chechenia's terrorism.
regards,
maestro