posted on Apr, 22 2007 @ 02:54 PM
So he dodged the issue a bit, but he does have a page and a plan to look into a "narrow portion" of 9/11 discrepancies. It seems a good enough
start, but a bit vague as to what exactly would be the scope and its also a bit disigenuous - there are discrepancies?
There are so many levels of
lies, BS, obfuscation etc around that day you could have a series of 9/11 Commissions, each digging just a tad deeper, and you'll still never get to
the toostieroll center.
IF this narrow portion includes any kind of investigation into demolition of the WTC it will likely implode its own chances by alienation a good chunk
of the populace - if it ignores the issue, it risks alienating another huge chunk that rightly sees this as perhaps the top anomaly... it's tricky
Dennis can't win the WH, but the idea should continue, if nothing else than as a chance to find new evidence, raise questions in new minds, and at
least as illustration of how deep the cover-up goes.