posted on Apr, 13 2007 @ 06:09 PM
I think he's wrong. I think an irrational transcendental number like pi should be simplified as much as it can be, even if you usually then would
have to multiply it by 2 in use.
Plus the Euler's formula he gave would be misleading, since the square root of 1 is both -1 and 1. The correct answer is only -1. Therefore, in his
scheme, pi could actually be zero in that formula.
[edit on 4/13/2007 by djohnsto77]