posted on Jul, 23 2010 @ 04:48 AM
OP, how do you explain Luke 10:25-28? When asked by a scribe "what must I do to inherit eternal life?", Jesus asks him "what is written in the
Law?" When the scribe answers with the two most important commandments "Love the Lord thy God...love thy neighbor...", Jesus tells him that he
answered correctly: "Do this, and you shall live."
There are other instances where Jesus explains what is required to inherit eternal life, or enter The Kingdom, and leaves Himself out of the equation.
The Beattitudes, and the statement about becoming like a child, come to mind.
John 14:6 is one of the most misunderstood and misinterpreted statements of Jesus. The word translated as "comes" (no man comes to the Father...)
in the Greek text is the word erchetai, which is strictly present tense. He is speaking to those seeing Him and experiencing Him at that moment. By
seeing Him at that moment, those in attendance were experiencing the Absolute, the "I AM" that He previously referred to. That scripture is not
about exclusivity, it is about what Jesus represented (The Way, The Truth, The Life) to those people at that moment. Fundamentalists have used this
verse to condemn to Hell (among others) Buddhist priests and Hindu mystics.
Have you ever read some of the comparison sayings/teachings of Buddha and Krishna? There are many that are remarkably similar to the words of Jesus.
Jesus would have been well aware of Buddhism and Hinduism, yet He never condemned them, or their adherents. (The Holy Spirit even kept Paul and his
companions from traveling to Asia.) The only religious people Jesus condemned were the Jewish leaders of His time; for the Jewish people of that day,
those leaders falsely represented themselves as "The Way." Something to think about...
Oh, and while you're at it, do a little research on Melchizedek...who was not an Israelite, had no parents, was never born, never died, yet Abraham
gave him a tithe, and Jesus is a high priest in the order of Melchizedek. This COULD be interpreted that Jesus was not the first incarnation of
Christ.