It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

It's suicide to question 9/11 - Hide instead - 2 must see videos

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 8 2007 @ 04:35 PM
link   
It's suicide to question the 9/11 story. The best thing to do is hide and prepare.

These two videos should help those who are learning disabled such as myself, understand.

Trust nothing.




Google Video Link



[edit on 8-4-2007 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Apr, 8 2007 @ 04:51 PM
link   
Well the first video was unwatchable. Now on to the second.


The second video makes some good points and was much more watchable than the first.

I suggest you do not try to use the first video to persuade people about 911.

[edit on 4-8-2007 by groingrinder]



posted on Apr, 8 2007 @ 04:53 PM
link   
And keeping silent is another kind of suicide, if one that more people find less annoying. It's a matter of weighing pros and cons. And since most of our evidence is provided by pros and cons, we should maybe compromise and settle for quiet but not silent until we have a solid case. Just my .02 again.



posted on Apr, 8 2007 @ 05:19 PM
link   
The only problem I have wit hthe explosives theory,
Is that..... the trade centres were a major iconic piece of the NYC Skyline.

building of such magnitude had never been demolished in that fashion ' if it was explosives '

How could they know, that the buildings coming down would 'mask' the explosives ?

I mean, if they layden the building with explosives, how did they know it would detonate as planned, but wouldnt be so obvious?

Its hard to explain but,
This size hadnt been done before, and they had to do it in a fashion that convinced the public it wasnt explosives..
so why would they take the risk of being exposed with explosives so brasonly?



posted on Apr, 8 2007 @ 05:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Caustic Logic
And keeping silent is another kind of suicide, if one that more people find less annoying. It's a matter of weighing pros and cons. And since most of our evidence is provided by pros and cons, we should maybe compromise and settle for quiet but not silent until we have a solid case. Just my .02 again.


It's really difficult to find out what the hell is really going on when everything is censored and there is so much insecurity everywhere.

The people don't care and the elite won't tell and even if they did would you trust them?

[edit on 8-4-2007 by In nothing we trust]


BPI

posted on Apr, 8 2007 @ 07:11 PM
link   
groingrinder, I disagree. The 1st video is excellent. It really shows alot of connections and brings alot of corporate interests that need to be addressed. You posted 16 minutes after the thread started. So you didnt even watch any of it. How can you make an opinion based on not watching it. The movie really gets into alot of serious points and gives alot of information most people are unaware of. Mr Raubin goes into his own opinion about some things and its very interesting, but most of the info is fact based and not opinion. I would ask you to tell me what you disagree with but we both know you didnt watch it.

I think its funny how the media really jumps on any other view point other than the official story. O'Reilly had a guest on a while back questioning the gov't and O'Reilly said if there was any evidence it would be on the front page. But look at what happens to someone who speaks up... Ms O'Donnell. O'Reilly dedicates a whole week to calling her names. He along with Scarborough, Hannity, Beck, & others are calling her names and saying she should be fired. Notice not one of them brought on a guest to discuss the Gulf of Tonkin or to discuss any of the issues she raised. It is suicide to question 9/11 because you will immediately be labeled dangerous, terroist sympathizer, anti-American, holocaust denier, crazy, loon, fat these are just a few names I heard this week. Why the media silence on Osama Bin Laden?



posted on Apr, 8 2007 @ 07:29 PM
link   
Screw this watchman crap.

I'm tired of peeling onions for low pay and little appreciation.

The elite are making all the money, they can watch themselves. I'm outta here.

[edit on 8-4-2007 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Apr, 8 2007 @ 08:46 PM
link   
You make good points BPI,I also liked the 1st video.I've seen other ct'ers on fox news and alot of them weren't even given the opportunity to speak.its ridiculous .


BPI

posted on Apr, 9 2007 @ 12:38 AM
link   
Just to illustrate a little further on questioning being suicide. Here are 2 quotes to show the way the media portrays 9/11.

I do believe that it's the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics that World Trade Center tower 7—building 7, which collapsed in on itself—it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved. World Trade Center 7. World Trade Center 1 and 2 got hit by planes — 7, miraculously, the first time in history, steel was melted by fire. It is physically impossible. To say that we don’t know that it imploded, that it was an implosion and a demolition, is beyond ignorant. Look at the films, get a physics expert here [on the show] from Yale, from Harvard, pick the school—[the collapse] defies reason. ...(Rosie O'Donnell 3/26/07)

O'Reilly, Hannity and Scarborough all say this is disrepectful to the 9/11 families and Rosie is dangerous, anti-American and should be fired. All 3 regularly name call and slander Ms O'Donnell in response.

These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis. These self-obsessed women seemed genuinely unaware that 9/11 was an attack on our nation and acted as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them. ... I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much ... the Democrat ratpack gals endorsed John Kerry for president ... cutting campaign commercials... how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy. (Ann Coulter response to The Jersey Girls from Ms Coulter's book Godless: The Church of Liberalism June 2006)

O'Reilly, Hannity, & Scarborough all have Ann Coulter on their show regularly. None seem to feel she is disrepectful to 9/11 families.



posted on Apr, 9 2007 @ 08:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by BPI
O'Reilly, Hannity and Scarborough all say this is disrepectful to the 9/11 families and Rosie is dangerous, anti-American and should be fired. All 3 regularly name call and slander Ms O'Donnell in response.


It really is amazing how much control they really have over the major media outlets and thus the entire population.

What kind of subliminal messages are they putting into the programing that goes out to the entire population?
(i.e. Don't resist, we know best, obey our rules, don't question authority, do as we say, you have no hope, we are your rulers)

[edit on 9-4-2007 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Apr, 10 2007 @ 12:37 AM
link   
Watch the 2nd video, at 21:15, you can see something crumbling down on top of WTC 7.. is this in anyway significant?



posted on Apr, 10 2007 @ 01:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by BigMoser
Watch the 2nd video, at 21:15, you can see something crumbling down on top of WTC 7.. is this in anyway significant?


That's a good catch, I didn't notice that before. I think it might be the east penthouse?

I'm not sure which direction I'm looking at in the video at 21:15



[edit on 10-4-2007 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Apr, 10 2007 @ 01:23 AM
link   
Here's another view of the roof of WTC7



BPI

posted on Apr, 10 2007 @ 02:04 PM
link   
In Nothing... I agree they do create a certain lifestyle portrayal in the media. Anytime you think outside of this, you lose credability to the media and all that follow it. The media barely even touches 9/11 scenerios or the cover-up that followed. If they do it's just to call people names and tell everyone how crazy these people are. If you notice alot of news channels have segments where they follow what's hot on the internet. Yet 9/11 theories are never in this group. A google search of 9/11 conspiracy returns over 2 million results. You know they have receive many emails concerning 9/11 as well. Yet they just ignore it and it seems as though it doesn't exist or it's just a fringe thing not worthy of mention. In this way, they've laid the groundwork for a mental automatic response to any other theories. People showing independant thought bring forward serious concerns about a horrific event in Amercan history are crazy, but people concerned about Brittney Spears in rehab and shaving her head are normal and "Good Americans." Now I must go. CNN is getting ready to annouce the father Anna Nicole Smith's baby.... this could change my life.

Just a reminder Anna Nicole Smith was stripper and porn celeb. This story is giving off a good message to young girls.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join