It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Originally posted by ludaChris
I'm all for Iran having nuclear energy, everyone should, its clean though expensive. If Iran can show without a shadow of a doubt that they are after energy only and not nukes, then I will support their endeavour 100%. But its just the way they have dealt with the IAEA that gives me pause about their motives. I will look forward to hearing the case he makes.
Thats the problem, they cant.
They refuse to use light-water reactors which do not produce weapons grade uranium or plutonium.
There is only a few reasons to use heavy-water reactors:
1. they can use raw uranium ore (unnecesary in iran's case since they enrich their uranium)
2. produce weapons grade plutonium
So their "peaceful" program is BS. The government knows this, thats why they are unconvinced.
Originally posted by Seeker PI
Originally posted by bodrul
would that be the speach where he said zionest regieme?
not israel which i last time checked zionest regieme wasnt a country :
It depends on what translation you read and who it came from bodrul.
I've seen it expressed as you state for sure. But I think it's irrelevant. It's the sentiment behind the words that count, and any "Zionist regime" has to include the State of Israel.
Dont get me wrong I would love see the situation resolved peacefully, but Ahmadinejad doesn't really want that, does he?]
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Well, Iran has been given the opportunity of using light-water reactors and it has refused. I cant understand why if they are already enriching uranium, they should not have a problem with light-water reactors, especially if it is for "peaceful purposes."
they insist on using heavy-water breeder type reactors.....
well, that kind of gives what they are up to away.
Originally posted by bodrul
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
So their "peaceful" program is BS. The government knows this, thats why they are unconvinced.
and most of this is BS
where is your evidence iran is building a bomb or intends to
i want to see some facts not some BS opinion
Mate I don't think the problem is with the kind of reactor or at least the major part of the problem has nothing to do with the type of reactor it is the fact that Iran want a full fule cyle this means enrichment and reprocessing. Once Iran has this then it becomes a Nuclear capable state. This is were the problem lies!
Also I have heard that with heavy water reactors you only need uranium and not enriched uranium! I am not sure how ture this is but if true then this is surely a peacfull use of heavy water reactor??
Iran has had the need to hide its program as the regime inside Iran considers the whole world against it and they were sure that they would be stopped if they said from the begining what they were wanting to do which is a full peacfull nuclear cycle. Heck even now they are getting stopped imagine how easy it would have been if from the begining they had announced their intentions!
i am no supporter of the Mullah regime.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
I have no problem with Iran using reactors if it follows all the guidelines established by the IAEA and opens ALL its facilities to full inspections.
Originally posted by bodrul
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
So their "peaceful" program is BS. The government knows this, thats why they are unconvinced.
and most of this is BS
where is your evidence iran is building a bomb or intends to
i want to see some facts not some BS opinion
Originally posted by zurvan
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
I have no problem with Iran using reactors if it follows all the guidelines established by the IAEA and opens ALL its facilities to full inspections.
Does US open All its facilities to UN inspecitons?
Originally posted by Mdv2
He has no evidence as he's yet another radicalized victim of fine American and Israeli propaganda. I'm not joking here, radicalism is not a Muslim only thing, as some believe on here nor is it always related to violence.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Originally posted by Mdv2
He has no evidence as he's yet another radicalized victim of fine American and Israeli propaganda. I'm not joking here, radicalism is not a Muslim only thing, as some believe on here nor is it always related to violence.
And you have no evidence that they are not. At this point, as others have said, there is more evidence indicating that Iran does plan to develop nuclear weapons and if your a european, you should be very concerned as europe will be in range of their missiles.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Yeah your right,
so what should we do,
blow them up, similar with what we did to iraq ( look how well thats going )
Or allow them to prove themselves. Which will either end up with us blowing them up, or finding a new partner in a world stage.
what is the better option?
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
And you have no evidence that they are not.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
At this point, as others have said, there is more evidence indicating that Iran does plan to develop nuclear weapons and if your a european, you should be very concerned as europe will be in range of their missiles.
Originally posted by ludaChris
But as Iran is a signatory of the NPT, is it too much to ask that they simply follow the guidelines they agreed to adhere to?
Originally posted by Mdv2
Could you elaborate which guideline Iran currently violates?
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Originally posted by zurvan
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
I have no problem with Iran using reactors if it follows all the guidelines established by the IAEA and opens ALL its facilities to full inspections.
Does US open All its facilities to UN inspecitons?
We arent threatening to "push israel into the mediteranean" either..
Originally posted by benevolent tyrant
Among the activities that places Iran in major violation of the IAEA treaties are:
- The failure to report Uranium Imports from China (Iran has acknowledged this)
- Iran did not inform the IAEA of it's program of Uranium Conversion (Iran acknowledged this).
-Iran did not report it's program of Uranium enrichment to the IAEA
-Iran did not report the presence of enrichment facilities or labs at several of their nuclear development sites.
-Iran did not report Laser Isotope Enrichment experiments, again an IAEA requirement
-Iran did not report the development of uranium dioxide and other Plutonium Experiments
Summary of Iran's IAEA violations