It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The case Cheney vs. U.S. District Court

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 4 2007 @ 10:16 PM

The case Cheney vs. U.S. District Court

The Argument: Vice President Cheney and his staff violated the open-government Federal Advisory Committee Act by meeting behind closed doors with energy industry executives, analysts and lobbyists.

The plaintiffs allege these discussions occurred during the formulation of the Bush administration's May 2001

For close to three years, Cheney and the administration have resisted demands that they reveal with whom they met and what they discussed.
Last year, a lower court ruled against Cheney and instructed him to turn over documents providing these details.

On Dec. 15, the Supreme Court announced it would hear Cheney's appeal. Three weeks later, Cheney and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia spent a weekend together duck hunting at a private resort in southern Louisiana, giving rise to calls for Scalia to recuse himself. So far, he has refused.

Why has the administration gone to such lengths to avoid disclosing how it developed its new energy policy?

Thats a good question, If there was nothing to hide, why would the administartion try so hard to AVOID disclosing to the public, what was said behind those doors...

May 2001... 4 months before sept11 these heads all met, and discussed the best way to go forward, in terms of Americas fuel resources.

They included maps of Middle East and Iraqi oilfields, pipelines, refineries and terminals, two charts detailing various Iraqi oil and gas projects, and a March 2001 list of "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts," detailing the status of their efforts. The documents are available at

So, before the Terrorist threat, before September 11, before the need to remove evil regimes hell bent on achieving sept11 goals........ we had already mapped out key Iraqi Oil fields, and suitable companies in which to use to setup key infrastructure.

Tell me, at this point.. were we trying to find a way of ASSISTING Iraq, and agreeing to TERMS with the 'then' current Iraqi regime?

Or had we already made the decision, that Iraq was worthy of a war, for these key oil fields?

An April 2001 report by the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations and the Baker Institute for Public Policy -- commissioned by Cheney to help shape the new energy policy -- also devoted serious attention to Iraq.

Even BEFORE this meeting in May, Iraq was being paid SERIOUS Attention by Cheney, and other energy gurus...

So this is twice, that Iraq has come up, long before sept11 as a key piece to American, industrial security... But im sure this is a mere co-incidence, right?

Now, here's the hum dinger

Significantly, the report concluded that the United States should immediately review its Iraq policy, including its military options.

In May2001, the American Energy policy, suggested immediate, and direct re-thinking of America's strategy TOWARDS IRAQ, including military ambitions.

So this beggs the question,

Having decided war against Iraq was viable, if it resulted in control of its Oil resources... how was the best way to make sure the public followed... after all .. militarily attacking a country with no means wont sit well with the polls.. especially in the mid-terms.

How in the world, can the US Government convince the American people that its in 'their' best interests.. to militarily confront a 'potentially' hostile, arab country????...

answer: September 11, 2001.

How can the world super power, make so many intellegence errors, especially based on something like weapons of mass destruction?

This needs large factories, chemical plants, munitions depot's, scientists and workers.... Had these things of existed, there would of been Sat photos, there would of been chemical traces found, there would of been munitions found...

How is it, the meeting between Atta and an Iraqi official in Prague, just happened to be a intel error?

Or that our key asset, Challabi, just happened to get everything wrong?

Isnt it OBVIOUS by now, that the real reasons behind Iraq, were NOT What we were led to beleieve?
Isnt it OBVIOUS by now, that September 11 was BENEFICIAL to the Governments ambitions, and that allowing it to happen, was better than stopping it ?

Dont you watch films such as this :
Link - beware, lots of explosions

Then look at this :

And think to yourself..

If Iraq was a worthy war, then why are the administration refusing to answer the intellegence errors?
Why is Cheney and co refusing to release the notes from the energy meetings?
Why is the government withholding so much evidence from September 11
Why are factions in the government making millions, upon millions of dollars of the Iraq war?
Why didnt we give our troops the appropriate armour, weapons?

why is it people like this

Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret. flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam. He is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F. Kennan Peace Prize, the President’s Medal of Veterans for Peace, the Society of Military Engineers Gold Medal (twice), six Air Medals, and dozens of other awards and honors. His Ph.D. is in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Caltech. He chaired 8 major international conferences, and is one of the country’s foremost experts on National Security.

has gone on the record to say this:

has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney. - He said it is plausible that the entire chain of military command were unaware of what was taking place and were used as tools by the people pulling the strings behind the attack.

Or how about the rules Dick Cheneys office plays by, does this seem odd for a 'legitimate man' ?

Despite an executive order signed by President Bush in 2003 requiring all agencies or “any other entity within the executive branch that comes into the possession of classified information’’ to report on its activities, the vice president’s office maintains that it has no legal obligation to report on its classification decisions.

Who is in CHARGE Exactly?

New questions about U.S. intelligence regarding Iraq's weapons of mass terror - ‘Vice President Cheney's office played a major role in the secret debates and pressed for the toughest critique of Saddam's regime, administration officials say

How many reports do you really need to read to see that Dick Cheney, was the centre piece of Energy aspects, was the centre piece of the September11 attacks and was also the man figure behind the push for the Iraq war?

As though this were normal! I mean the repeated visits Vice President Dick Cheney made to the CIA before the war in Iraq. The visits were, in fact, unprecedented. During my 27-year career at the Central Intelligence Agency, no vice president ever came to us for a working visit.


I mean, there's nothing STRANGE about all this is there..

My question, is who is running side by side with Cheney?
Which up coming Candidate, is Cheney in Bed with?
Anyone have any information?

[edit on 4-3-2007 by Agit8dChop]

[edit on 4-3-2007 by Agit8dChop]

posted on Mar, 5 2007 @ 10:46 PM
That's pretty damn good


log in