New terror alert is to hide damaging info on Saddams capture.

WTF raising the alert level in the USA has to do with trying to cover some BS story somebody came up with about the Kurds supossedly catching Sodamninsane? In what POSSIBLE WAY could the simple raising of the security level cover ANYTHING???


Some of you guys really make me laugh....

[Edited on 21-12-2003 by Affirmative Reaction]

What's so hard to believe about that? Terrorism is a great cover up. Clinton had to bomb another country the day the bj scandal broke.
www.worldnetdaily.com...
abcnews.go.com...
www.prisonplanet.com...
www.lewisnews.com...
www.prisonplanet.com...

They are asking specifically about the terror alert, not terrorisim in general.

I don't know how reliable Debka is as an intelligence source, but it's usually very pro Bush and pro Israel, so this story is kind of odd.

www.debka.com...

A number of questions are raised by the incredibly bedraggled, tired and crushed condition of this once savage, dapper and pampered ruler who was discovered in a hole in the ground on Saturday, December 13:

1. The length and state of his hair indicated he had not seen a barber or even had a shampoo for several weeks.

2. The wild state of his beard indicated he had not shaved for the same period

3. The hole dug in the floor of a cellar in a farm compound near Tikrit was primitive indeed � 6ft across and 8ft across with minimal sanitary arrangements - a far cry from his opulent palaces.

4. Saddam looked beaten and hungry.

5. Detained trying to escape were two unidentified men. Left with him were two AK-47 assault guns and a pistol, none of which were used.

6. The hole had only one opening. It was not only camouflaged with mud and bricks � it was blocked. He could not have climbed out without someone on the outside removing the covering.

7. And most important, $750,000 in 100-dollar notes were found with him (a pittance for his captors who expected a $25m reward)� but no communications equipment of any kind, whether cell phone or even a carrier pigeon for contacting the outside world.

According to DEBKAfile analysts, these seven anomalies point to one conclusion: Saddam Hussein was not in hiding; he was a prisoner.

...

From Gen. Sanchez�s evasive answers to questions on the $25m bounty, it may be inferred that the Americans and Kurds took advantage of the negotiations with Saddam�s abductors to move in close and capture him on their own account, for three reasons





[Edited on 22-12-2003 by Helioform]

[Edited on 22-12-2003 by Helioform]

Originally posted by DiRtYDeViL
What's so hard to believe about that? Terrorism is a great cover up. Clinton had to bomb another country the day the bj scandal broke.
www.worldnetdaily.com...
abcnews.go.com...
www.prisonplanet.com...
www.lewisnews.com...
www.prisonplanet.com...

Nope...nothing here...just more of the bull# usually posted when these laughable accusations come up. The only SLIGHTLY reliable source you give, ABC, says NOTHIGN to back up your preposterous claim! The rest are, as usual, anti-Bush, Anti-gov, anarchist web sites that are full of nothing but bull...takes a pretty gullable person to use them for "truthful" information...