It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ste2652
I really hope that the SNP receive a thrashing in the May elections - it would show them that, even three hundred years on, the United Kingdom isn't going anywhere yet.
Originally posted by stumason
What i would like to see is Scottish MP's not being able to vote on english matter's. We cannot vote on Scottish matter's but they can on ours (incidentaly boosting Labour's majority... Hmmm....). And perhaps not have so many Scot's in the cabinet. They are abit over represented if you ask me. Apart from that, keep the Union.
Originally posted by stumason
It doesn't matter how few there are compared to the English MP's, it's the Principle.
They banged on for years about wanting their Parliament, now they have it. We're not even asking for our own parliament, but just that the bloody jocks not vote on solely English issues. We can't vote on Scottish one's, so why not vice versa?
Is that too much to ask?
Originally posted by Odium
The problem is, stumason. The Parliament in London is for the United Kingdom not England. We need our own one for English only MPS, one for Welsh and the Scotish one. With them only needing to meet on matters that involve the whole United Kingdom.
Originally posted by stumason
You don't need that at all. You could dispense with their piddly assemblies (save the wages of Scotts MSP's and MP's) and have it all back in London. If something concern's only one nation, then they vote on it.
bloody jocks
And you can keep your haggis-picking flippers off the oil too
Originally posted by boyg2004
Don't tell me... You have a shaved head, a St George tatoo, and fly a flag on your car as well.
Originally posted by boyg2004
Also, if I came on here and said things such as 'bloody paki's' or 'bloody gooks' then I would be banned from the board.
Originally posted by Odium
How fantastic.
So what we do is, we have an MP who represents an area and doesn't live there for what 5 years? Sorry but that's not my kind of democracy. I am already sick and tired of MPs getting the jobs and moving to London. A Scotish MP can not spend 12hrs a day, every day on a trip to and from London (if not longer). When they move they loose contact with the area and the areas problems.
Remember an MP represents his area not his party. How can you honestly represent somewhere you've not lived for years? How do you know the problems your area faces? throwing them all down London won't help this and it won't help that a lot of the public no longer vote because of instances like this.