It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As far as hydrogen production being fuel efficient...
Super-Efficient Electrolysis
Originally posted by zerotime
I think it is perfectly reasonable to question the "science" of global warming. We have less than 100 years of good recorded weather data from a rock that is 6 billion years old. We know that the weather has changed in the past and that humans had nothing to do with those changes. According to the current data the Earth "may" have warmed up to 1 degree total in a system that is plus or minus one degree of error. Go back 30 years and you will see that these same scientists were warning the world of an oncoming ice age - well that didn't happen so they changed gears. Scientific data also suggests that the sun and other planets in our solar system are slightly warmer - like Mars for example. I'm sorry but I believe most scientists involved in this study (on both sides) are using it for political purposes and it is not only smart to question these studies and the motives of these scientists but it is a responsibility.
Originally posted by AlphaAnuOmega
The Saturn Ion has a supercharger. Turbo chargers work by using the waste exhuast from your engine to spin a turbine to push air into cylinders to allow more gas to enter the piston. This then consumes more gas by way of forced induction.
A superscharger is an electric motor that gives you horsepower by using your cars battery power to spin a turbine to force air into your cylinders. Again, uses more gas. This is more efficient than a turbocharger, yet, still consumes more gas.
Originally posted by ressiv
lolll the outburst of the volcano PINATUBA puts moore co2 in the air as we produced teh last 200 years!!!!!.....global warming is a natural process...ofcourse you canput human role in it..but it wo'nt make any differance in the natural process!
Originally posted by ressiv
take a look at germany..the want a law that big emmision cars are paying moore tax....nice! but the germans will sell that cars wich will be driving than in romania ect ect.....instead of schrapping them....the problem stays! ..but in other country's.......nice deals for the car manufactures...and labor.....but defenatly ot solving the problems!....thats the hoax!...and we pay for it!
Originally posted by sp00ner
Originally posted by zerotime
I think it is perfectly reasonable to question the "science" of global warming. We have less than 100 years of good recorded weather data from a rock that is 6 billion years old. We know that the weather has changed in the past and that humans had nothing to do with those changes. According to the current data the Earth "may" have warmed up to 1 degree total in a system that is plus or minus one degree of error. Go back 30 years and you will see that these same scientists were warning the world of an oncoming ice age - well that didn't happen so they changed gears. Scientific data also suggests that the sun and other planets in our solar system are slightly warmer - like Mars for example. I'm sorry but I believe most scientists involved in this study (on both sides) are using it for political purposes and it is not only smart to question these studies and the motives of these scientists but it is a responsibility.
I think it's reasonable to question as well. I did, and I made my decision. I find it odd to think that you distrust global observations that have been made with 1000 times the accuracy as a study of extraterrestial planets, but cite temps on other planets as a key fact. So... we can't possibly have accurate data for this planet, but we can for others? This is part of your arguement? I dunno about that... that seems real odd.
www.evuk.co.uk
C) And try, if you will, typing the keywords:
"electric Lexus" + "Minority Report"
...in the world's No. 1 Search Engine ie.Google and - surprise surprise - ZERO results are returned. The silence speaks volumes...
Yes indeed - it's yet again all-too apparent, folks, that the world's media still can't bring itself to use that most hated and heretical of words: "electric"....
- nor can our automotive powers-that-be yet stomach the idea of the public at large getting too turned on by the sight of sexy supercars powered by effete and effeminate (..right?) electric motors instead of thrusting, throbbing pistons, cranks and gaskets....
Originally posted by ressiv
oil companie Shell holds the patent of the stirling motor since 1950.....then ask youreself ..wo rules and make the law's...we can live without oil! and natural gas....the technics are availyble...but money wins afterall...