It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gfad
Originally posted by Darkpr0
The link's dead for me, but if that's the 1-engined, long-nosed version of the Raptor it wasn't real. Nice looking piece of work though, and it looks like a feasible "light" design of the Raptor.
Darkpr0 are you thinking of these images:
If so these are prototypes and proposals for a new Japanese fighter not the PAKFA.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
reply to post by Karthik1981
Yea well the IAF doesn't move the goal post because its fun to do so or it likes to play donkey and carrot with HAL.
If the Tejas is to be of any benefit as an operational fighter, it must conform to minimum flight envelope characteristics that allow it to be competitive against other gen 4 a/c in the neighborhood a la FC-1, F-16, J-10 etc..
Now whether the IAF knew these characteristics when they specd out the Tejas, or are these requirements evolving every year, is to be seen.
I am interested to know which other a/c the Tejas engine is being proposed for.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
reply to post by Karthik1981
Yea well the IAF doesn't move the goal post because its fun to do so or it likes to play donkey and carrot with HAL.
If the Tejas is to be of any benefit as an operational fighter, it must conform to minimum flight envelope characteristics that allow it to be competitive against other gen 4 a/c in the neighborhood a la FC-1, F-16, J-10 etc..
Now whether the IAF knew these characteristics when they specd out the Tejas, or are these requirements evolving every year, is to be seen.
I am interested to know which other a/c the Tejas engine is being proposed for.
Originally posted by Karthik1981
You know there was another fighter bomber Aircraft called HAL Marut in the 1960's. That fighter jet had a similar problem of being underpowered.
I will blame it on IAF, because, their Top-Brass never specify the Optimum power level they are looking at for an engine.
The scientists in DRDO proposed development of every IP Core from the scratch in their own premises. but the Top Officials ridiculed the scientists.
especially ASDSP and USB 2.0 OTG and JTAGs.
The Top Officials simply suffocated the development, now you would want to know why?>
Answer: Foreign companies if provide alternate solutions, the lobby masters will get 10-15% which easily sum up as 2000,000-3000,000 INR per lobby-master. These masters own 200 Acres of Land on an average, they run educational institutes. Some even became one of the biggest service providers for the defence organizations.