It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
On another note, if the USAF is so hell-bent on not buy a Navy jet (which I really cannot understand as to why) then perusing a possible jammer/Wild Weasel variant of the F-15 is the best choice. It has the electronics, weapons, room for growth, two man crew, kinematics etc... for the job. I just fear this is one of those times where nothing will come of the idea or we'll end up with very few such aircraft.
The USAF seems unsure of itself and what they want/need, they have no clear objectives, time-lines and or projects. It all seems to be study, propose, evaluate but not build. The Navy on the other hand is much more focused and on point with regards to having a dedicated EW/Jammer. We'll see how things play out but when we begin retiring out F-16's and still not have come up with a solution how to replace the (Wild Weasels) then the brown stuff will really hit the fan.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
The question I ask is why doesn't the USAF just suck it up and buy some EA-18G's instead of wasting money, time, and effort not to mention airframes by venturing in a more risky solution with an 'EA-15E'? Aren't we all suppose to be on the same team here? Who cares if it's a Navy jet. The money they spend on development costs for the possible "EA-15E" could go towards buying the Hornets, now, and in the process they would be lowering the cost of each airframe allowing themselves and the Navy to possibly purchase more.