It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dgtempe
All Americans love their country with passion.
Originally posted by benevolent tyrant
Originally posted by dgtempe
I love America- land of the free...May we all continue to be "free"...
I would gladly fight for our freedom, if necessary. I would not fight just on the whim of some president who happens to be a warmonger, however.
BTW, are we protected from North Korea, or are we still placing all our focus on the Middle East?
What would you say if the U.S. attacked North Korea? I have heard this particular piece of rhetoric a bit too often as of late. I am sure that you yourself have read questions on this very site asking why did the U.S. attack Iraq when North Korea is a real threat.
But, because President George Bush attacked Iraq, instead of North Korea, this makes him a "warmonger"?
dgtempe, I love reading your posts. You often make wonderful posts that are insightful and poignant. However your irrational hatred for George Bush has, perhaps, clouded your judgement.
George Bush did not order U.S. troops into Iraq on a whim. Nor did he do so without the full consent of Congress. There were plenty of key Democrats who took the same stance against Saddam Hussein and his regime;
George Bush vs Bill Clinton, Republicans vs Democrats or the hypocrisy of ideological adherence
If George Bush is the "devil" then so are many of the key Democrats who voted for the war right along side Bush's Satanic minions -- the Republicans.
dgtempe, I'm not defending George Bush and I'm not attacking the Democrats, I'm simply calling a spade a spade. Clinton was certainly no better or worse than Bush except for the fact that he has what Bush could never have -- an undeniable sense of charisma.
As for attacking North Korea, or, rather, why the U.S. doesn't attack North Korea, it's very simple. The North Koreans never needed or depended upon nukes to keep the U.S. from invading they had another deterrent -- artillery. I know it sounds silly to think that an "outdated" artillery piece could be considered a deterrence but when you consider that North Korea has over 13,000 artillery guns placed in hardened bunkers all within range of Seoul, South Korea's capital deterrence takes on a more conventional but effective face.
Artillery
North Korea has an estimated 13,000 artillery sites stationed in secure bunkers, many of which are aimed at targets in and around the South Korean capital, Seoul. Such a large collection of artillery could potentially drop 300,000 shells per hour on the city.
Indeed, the presence of such a large force is seen by many as a significant threat. However, due to the fact that U.S. officials believe every fourth round has a chemical tip, the artillery arm of the DPRK military could inflict a considerable amount of casualties upon the population of South Korea. militaryhistory.about.com...
When one considers that Seoul, South Korea is the fifth largest city in the world with a population of over ten million people, conventional weapons massed in concentrated fire could easily be considered a WMD.
Another reason why the U.S. doesn't attack North Korea is simple, militarily, strategically and politically, this would be far more difficult for the U.S. to do. But I am sure that if North Korea rattles it's sabres and fires off a few more nukes while the Great Leader pompously threatens the U.S. and allies in the region, I am sure that Bush or his Democrat successor will definitely attack.
I know that I digress from the main topic of this thread but hatred or President Bush is certainly an aspect that should be explored. Perhaps the thread should have been titled "Do you hate President George Bush"? It certainly seems like this collective hatred for Bush is due to the war on Iraq. Yet is this a rational hatred? Would we have hated Clinton had he attacked? Or, in keeping with the theme of the thread, would the United States and Americans be hated if this had been Clinton's war or Kerry's?
[edit on 10/12/2006 by benevolent tyrant]
Originally posted by spinstopshere
And for arrogant self centered, ungraitful countries you forgot to mention france.
Originally posted by chissler
Ignorance is ignorance, and we are all guilty of it at one time or another.
Originally posted by grover
What an absurd thread. I love my country, its the current administration and their arrogant and reckless behavior on the world stage that I despise.
Originally posted by benevolent tyrant
Why have George Bush's actions, his policies become synonymous with America and it's people? How is it that George Bush and the Republican party are alone to be blamed for a war which the Democrats called for themselves?
Originally posted by grover
What an absurd thread. I love my country, its the current administration and their arrogant and reckless behavior on the world stage that I despise.
Originally posted by MacDonagh
Screaming into your Xbox communicators will not make you go faster, shoot better, and constant cussing says more about your character then it does about the person you are attacking.