It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Possible photos of the TR3-B Triangle

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 05:32 AM
these photos were taken a few months ago
at first i thought it was a ufo but a friend told me about the TR3-B Triangle i think this is what i captured
if you dont no about the TR3-B Triangle heres a link it includes a lot of secret military craft its a good read
heres the pics
all photos were taken between 4:18pm and 4:52pm
photos were taken in Sydney Australia
heres some close ups
so what do you think did i capture the TR3-B Triangle?
any questions just ask

[edit on 6-10-2006 by CYRAX]

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 06:40 AM
Why do you think it is a TR-3 over any of a number of other possibilities? You are being quite specific in what you think it is. I'm interested to know why.

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 07:04 AM
I've got to admit, after seeing another set of pictures of a triangular craft, I have placed my feet in the 'its real' camp. Cyrax, your pictures are unusual, but could show loads of different things, even conventional aircraft - so what makes you think its the TR-3B unless of course you live near pine gap...then i'd be expecting some low level low alt shots of it!

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 09:04 AM
Like i said my friend told me about the craft
i always believed that the pics was some sort of secret military craft
and as you can see its not a normal craft
heres the info my friend said about the pics
"Those were all the same trialgle craft, TR-3?, that generated the cylindrical
or conical lightning display.

Was that in a dark cloud earlier that day?

The one with 4 cones was a mirror image I assume, it had a dark background.
If not, then I don't have an explanation for that one."

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 09:23 AM
A little bit off topic.

I wonder why the Belgian government never filed charges against the U.S. government for possible violations of airspacee during the mass sightings of 1990?? Thousands of people saw that ship fly over Belgium.

Some of those pictures you took do seem to look like a triangular craft..

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 09:31 AM
Some pictures look like jet contrails. Although some look real

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 09:43 AM
Interesting stuff, I'm genuienly impressed!

I really do think you've got something secret in those photos, you don't mind if I save them all do ya?

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 09:49 AM
The Bandit,
thousands saw those craft, including military chase craft and radar sites, and yet the way it sped around the sky and did 'impossible' things could of been a reason why the Belgium authorities didn't press the issue - OR the USA could of sent a 'diplomatic' request not to make waves - As i bet the last thing the USA thought the belgiums would do was publish all the pictures and tapes....rofl who ever was flying it sure must of had some fun though!

Cyrax, great pictures dude, keep it up!

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 10:47 AM
I think these two photos below show a standard aircraft flying almost directly away from the photographer with its contrail (shortened by perspective) being lit up from below by the sunset. Its a pretty common sighting, at least on these boards.

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 12:00 PM
Completely agree gfad.

The images in general are too distant and too ill defined to draw any positive conclusion except that it was something in the sky, I certainly don't see a triangle shape, or anything else that says 'this is not an aeroplane'. There just isn't enough definition, sadly.

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 06:53 PM
how can this be a aeroplane?
this does not look triangle to you
heres a link with the triangle ufo
what do you think about the first set of pics?
you told me about the second set but why not the first?

[edit on 6-10-2006 by CYRAX]

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 07:12 PM
Zanzibar you can save them if you want

heres a pic of a aeroplane
heres pics which my friend who has a photographic background did for me
they are very impressive
this one shows the triangle

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 07:50 PM
Those do not have enough definition to make an accurate identification.

I don't know how you claim to the conclusion of the TR-3B, it doesn't even look like a triangle. It looks like some balls of light next to each other, hardly the TR-3B.

Of all the time I've spent looking at aircraft while flying or studying them, I think I can fairly say what looks like an airplane in the sky, and that just looks like some object in the sky, I can't tell you what it is, simply not enough definition.

The zoomed in images don't help either, it's all blurred and out of focus like almost all other TR-3B photos. The Belgium UFO photos have to be the most compelling images I have ever seen of the craft. All the others are immitating.

I have to go on what waynos said, it's too difficult to tell.

And I am convinced beyond a doubt that those are NOT triangles.

But other than that, very nice catch of the object in the sky, it looks very peculiar as I can't identify it, so it is a mystery because I don't know what it is.

Shattered OUT...

[edit on 6-10-2006 by ShatteredSkies]

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 11:33 PM
Do you have any pictures with higher resolution?

800x600 isn't very high...unless those are cell phone pics.

I think you were to far away to be able to distinguish a normal aircraft from a secret aircraft.

Also...are those contrails...or is it blurry from your moving the camera...or it moving fast?

Could you hear it?
How fast was it going? (estimate)
Did it slowely go until out of sight...or did it seemingly just dissappear?

posted on Oct, 7 2006 @ 04:39 AM
link they are not phone pics the camera used was a digital kodak camera
3."I think you were to far away to be able to distinguish a normal aircraft from a secret aircraft."
i think you are a sceptic
4."Also...are those contrails...or is it blurry from your moving the camera...or it moving fast?"
you cant be serious
6.could not tell
7.dissappeard behind clouds

posted on Oct, 7 2006 @ 12:58 PM
Close ups don't count much, the triangle shape can be discerned in the far shots.

The TR-3B was mentioned in reguard to triangle craft and the Belgium incident,
on this or another forum, thus I picked up the nomenclature and posted to CYRAX.

| o O\ The bright circles are a new type of propulsion.
|O /

That looks like a full size craft but some new youtube videos look like models
with mini thrustors.

posted on Oct, 7 2006 @ 05:34 PM
here's a couple of pics I picked up off the net, I know nothing about them other than they are a bit interesting and look like the supposed TR-3B.

Now, if these could be proven not to be fakes it would be something special, but distant, indistiguishable splodges and spangly shining objects like we see in the other pictures don't prove anything I'm afraid.

Earlier in the thread it was asked of them 'how could these be planes?'

Well, from that distance quite easily as the distorting effect of the sun reflecting off steel can give all sorts of illusions.

[edit on 7-10-2006 by waynos]

posted on Oct, 7 2006 @ 05:43 PM
I wouldn't be the least bit suprised if the objects are planes at maybe 20 thousand, 15 thousand feet. At certain times in the day in certain seasons, the angle of the sun to the latitude you're at can cause illusions from the reflected light on metal high up in the atmosphere or even right down on the ground.

Cyrax, expect there to be skeptics, because quite frankly a few blurred pictures are not going to make believers out of people.

Shattered OUT...

posted on Oct, 7 2006 @ 08:28 PM
Blurry is always the word on ufos due to the electromagnetic disturbance.

The triangle is posted frequently.

When the three apex circles are bright its called balloons.

When in a dark cloud its a bad lens or film development.

If you see a nice shiny highly detailed picture of a ufo, its a fake.

You can't have a clear picture, its the nature of the game.

I like fuzzy fakes, then I give all the telltail real ufo traits.

posted on Oct, 7 2006 @ 08:55 PM
great post Telsa that how i feel
its never good enough and i wont believe that it was normal aeroplane

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in