It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong
but IMHO they should have said "she is always welcome to not attend here, if you dont approve of curriculum...
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
If the story contained the kinds of elements that those here contend, the father and daughter would not have been content with just having another book assigned. They would have burned down the school or entered into a lawsuit, or murdered someone, but they did not. It appears that they simply went about their business, as good Americans should.
I think I did read the book many years ago. In fact, now that I think about it, I'm certain that I did. I read it so that I could understand the movie, which lost me very early on.
However, my comments were not meant to be a critique of the book, but of the right of people to have some control over what their children are exposed to.
Maybe the man and his daughter are wrong. I don't remember enough about the book to say, but calling them less than human for exercising their rights of dissent is very un-ATS, in my opinion.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
I also think this man and his daughter, if they had their way, would turn back the clock 400 years or more, and we'd all be eating watery soup out of wooden bowls, listening intently to the scraps of wisdom tossed to us by rich, fat men in gilded robes, who walk across the piazza atop our backs to avoid dirtying their vestments.
Originally posted by whaaa
And try and get the book banned so no one else can read it either. Yep thats the good old American way all right.
"It's just all kinds of filth," said Alton Verm, adding that he had not read "Fahrenheit 451." "The words don't need to be brought out in class. I want to get the book taken out of the class."
www.hcnonline.com
A district student, employee or resident can challenge any educational material in CISD on the basis or appropriateness, according to CISD EFA (local) policy. An informal reconsideration is first attempted. Informal requests are not documented, so Hines said he did not know how many requests were handled informally.
The person can make a formal challenge, which Alton Verm did. A committee will be appointed to review the material, discuss the material and report findings about the request to the principal, parent and superintendent, Hines said. The process takes about two weeks.
www.hcnonline.com
"Not every book is appropriate for every person, but every person should have their work that they choose," Williams said. "The public library is for everyone."
The Montgomery County Memorial Library System has received 65 requests to challenge books since 2002, Williams said. The library has removed "Castro," for factual inaccuracies, and "Tomorrow Wendy," because it was not under the library's current guidelines, Williams said. The library also has a process for people to follow if they challenge a book, Williams said.
However, Williams said a public library is different than a school library.
"As a public library, we are the library for everyone," Williams said. "The school library is meant to be the library for that select group at that school."
www.hcnonline.com
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
However, my comments were not meant to be a critique of the book, but of the right of people to have some control over what their children are exposed to.
The fact is that the book will not be banned, regardless of the outcome of this case. It might be taken off a reading list or it might be removed from a school library, but anyone who wants to read it will still be able to find it and do so.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I don't see a word about banning the book, only removing it from the curriculum. No one would be prohibited from reading the book.
Originally posted by GradyPhilPott
However, my comments were not meant to be a critique of the book, but of the right of people to have some control over what their children are exposed to.