It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But the administration, he pointed out, had entertained such hopes before over the past two years -- when it had set up a new legal framework for Iraq, when it had first turned a modicum of government power over to handpicked Iraqis and when ousted dictator Saddam Hussein had been captured -- and those hopes had been dashed every time. There would be a window of about two months after the election "to start to see progress," he told Bush. "If by the first of April this insurgency is not starting to ameliorate in some way, then I think you really have a problem."
Elections, and talking about democracy, were unlikely to stop the insurgency, he said. Only the fledgling Iraqi army could do that, and it was unclear whether it would ever succeed. Its competence was not just a matter of training, Powell said; it was a question of whether the troops believed in what they were fighting for.
Originally posted by niteboy82
I hate to say this, but I think this is just part of the game.
I know some of you despise this name, but David Icke did a well documented expose' last year on Colin Powell in his newsletter, and this guys background, all the way back to Vietnam. It wasn't pretty, but it was well documented, including that he had a hand in the coverup of Mai Lai.
Originally posted by deluded
I still don't like him. He agreed to sign up with the pack of loons and probably would have stayed indefinitely. I do agree, however that this was the best thing that happened to him. If he wants to impress me (and I know he doesn't) or make amends for the attrocities he sold us in the run up to the war, he needs to comeclean on national TV and lay it all out. What was known when, who said what, etc. A confessional if you will.
Tell the truth!
But alas he will be the "good soldier" until the bitter end.
Originally posted by marg6043
So not blame Powell for his speech at the UN he did what he was told by Bush.
Originally posted by marg6043
So not blame Powell for his speech at the UN he did what he was told by Bush.
Originally posted by Keyhole
He did make that speech because Bush wanted him to,
but the facts he was giving he also believed in, it wasn't until later that it was found out the info from intelligence wasn't cold hard facts.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
But the only thing with powell that bothers me, is that UN presentation.
Was he duped, and believed what he was saying was true?
meaning he obviosly couldnt sort the crap from the truth? so its probably good we dont have a man of that ability in a power position.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
so let me get this..
Donald rumsfeild offered his resignation, but it was refused.. and look at the lives he has cost this country... The president refuses to remove him....