It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by D4rk Kn1ght
The B-2 was not ready for bombing missions during the Gulf war... Gulf war II maybe but not the first one.
Any how, the B-2 and F-117 have totaly different roles and abilities... The fact that they are stealths is the only similarities...
Originally posted by ghost
I read your prievious post about the Hornets. However, I still don't see why the Mariens can't just change their mind and get Super Hornets. Also, why does the F-35 need to be stealth? The Harrie filled the mission just fine without it. their buying an expensive airplane with a bunch of unneeded add-ons. It's like spending $1000 on a delux table saw to cut a simple board. A $5 hand saw can do the job just as well!
Sorry but th e F-35 is Just plain wasteful! We can do just as much with a plane costing 1/2 the price.
Originally posted by ghost
Right Now there are TOO MANY stealth programs. They use it for everything as if it's unlimited. Folks, Stealth is like any out technology, IT HAS LIMITS!
Originally posted by kilcoo316
What are these limits you speak of?
Originally posted by ghost
1. Stealth Aircraft are NOT invisible- See the thread on How Stealth works!
2. Even with the latest technology, stealth aircraft require more maintance to remain combat ready.
3. A stealth has to be bigger then other aircraft of the same payload, because EVERYTHING has to fit inside the aircraft.
4. Stealth is expensive! It foolish to make a big investment unless you expect a Bigger payoff.
5. The main Advantage of stealth is in achieveing surpise. If all your planes are stealth, you loose some of this surprise.
Tim
Originally posted by ghost
Stealth technology is valuable, don't get me wrong! If use wisely, it can be a critical asset that can turn the tide of a war in your favor at critical moments. However, like anything else, It can be overused and misused. The US seems to be like a spoiled child in a candy store when it comes to stealth technology. If it's stealth, they WANT it. Right Now there are TOO MANY stealth programs. They use it for everything as if it's unlimited. Folks, Stealth is like any out technology, IT HAS LIMITS!
Advanced Tactical Fighter/F-22: Of debateable value. The F-22 is a GREAT fighter, however, an Air-to-Air fighter doesn't really need all the fancy stealth. I'm not picking on Lockheed, the Northrop YF-23 would be in the same boat.
Joint Strike Fighter/F-35: Totally unneeded! A new fighter/strike to fill an F-16\F/A-18\ A-10\AV-8B type role is good, but stealth isn't needed for this mission. Why fly a stealth in daylight at low altitude?
F-117 Nighthawk: Not my favorite aircraft, but has an improtant role when used right. This aircraft, or something simular should be limited to covert op's like supporting Delta Force on secret missions. It's not that great for a normal war time missions, as it is very limited in range and payload.
Originally posted by justin_barton3
F-117 Nighthawk: Not my favorite aircraft, but has an improtant role when used right. This aircraft, or something simular should be limited to covert op's like supporting Delta Force on secret missions. It's not that great for a normal war time missions, as it is very limited in range and payload.
i agree although i would like to add that it could be used to kick down the proverbial door for a wave of unstealth planes/cruise missiles/helicopters as i believe it did in the second gulf war.
Originally posted by Figher Master FIN
I have to disagree. The stealth in the F-22 is very valuable. Because of it the F-22 can move without getting noticed and it gives it a capability to bomb without getting noticed.
The F-35 will aslo need the steath at night time. You have to agree with me on that. Simply said stealth might not be a must, but it sure hell is valuable.
[edit on 29-9-2006 by Figher Master FIN]
Originally posted by ghost
Originally posted by kilcoo316
What are these limits you speak of?
1. Stealth Aircraft are NOT invisible- See the thread on How Stealth works! Stealth Technology Explained
2. Even with the latest technology, stealth aircraft require more maintance to remain combat ready.
3. A stealth has to be bigger then other aircraft of the same payload, because EVERYTHING has to fit inside the aircraft.
4. Stealth is expensive! It foolish to make a big investment unless you expect a Bigger payoff.
5. The main Advantage of stealth is in achieveing surpise. If all your planes are stealth, you loose some of this surprise.
Tim
Originally posted by ghost
The F-22 isn't supposed to be bombing stuff anyway. It's an Air Superiority Fighter, it was design to replace the F-15. The Air Force added the bombing idea because they weren't sure if they could convince congress to buy a new plane purely for the air to air mission
Originally posted by ghost
Where would you draw the line? A stealth cargo plane, A stealth AWACS, A stealth VIP aircraft for war times? Each of these is possible, and one could argue a use for any of them if he or she wished too.
Ok Figher Master FIN, Where would you draw the line? How much is too much in your oppinion?
Tim
Originally posted by longbow
Marine JSF advantage is not only stealth it has also twice the range of Harrier, can carry larger payload and it's VTOL system is better than Harrier's. It has also more advanced equipment compared to Harrier.