One man terrorist is another mans freedom fighter...

So just so you dont get confused who is who...the LA times has decided it for you.


story.news.yahoo.com.../nm/20031106/ts_nm/iraq_usa_media_dc

What I've to say is : www.abovetopsecret.com...

They Are Not Freedom Fighters !

The Iraqis carring on hostilities in iraq
can call themselves "oppressionfighters"
they shure a Hell are Not Fighting for Freedom of Any sort....

OH ! Im Sorry
I guess im wrong............

They are fighting for the Freedom to:

Plot the Deaths on NonIslamic people just for thrills

Treat Women as Property

Support efforts to attack the US by any means

Destroy Isreal

Make Payments to Keep the Suicide Attacks going

Torture their Own Citizens

Conduct Ethnic Cleansing

To make any non-Ba'thist political activity illegal again

Make membership of any other political party punishable by death

To annex Kuwait and rape and kill its citizens

To create Weapons of Mass Destruction

To use Chemical Weapon on Women and Children

To devaste the Mesopotamian marshes and its People

To Kill other Moslems because their of another sect

To violate the Geneva Convention

To expell U.N. humanitarian relief workers

To reopen the Abu Gharib and Radwaniyah prisons

To forcibly deport Kurdish and Turkomen families

To videotape the rape of female relatives of suspected opposition

To decapitated women and men in front of their family

To Kill the most senior Shi�a religious leader in Iraq

To amputate as a form of punishment the tongues of persons who criticize Saddam Hussein

To make Amnesty Internationals "world�s worst record" for numbers of persons who have disappeared

To not permit freedom of speech or freedom of the press

To suppress the of freedom of thought expression information .association.. and assembly

To Continued execution of Kurds

***********

I Guess YOU Support These Ideas ?? Do You !??

If You Do
In My BooK You Are the Embodiment
Of
EVIL

Reminds me when people tried to change the term suicide bomber to homicide bomber. The first one was more accurate. And now we have go through this over again.


What is that called anyway? Political Correctness, Language Police?

I'm of the belief as ultra_phoenix....
It's a matter of how one percieves this.
Example:
A suicide bomber may be called a terrorist by one nation and a martyr by another.
Same can be applied to "resistance fighter". One may view them as such and another may view them as "insurgents" or "guerrilla's".....
Media has a problem with word usage and word play anyhow....this article doesn't surprise me the least bit.

It all boils down to perception and how one wishes to view and then define terms and words.


regards
seekerof

straterx


They dont see the US and Brits in any better lite.

We can all sit here and list out things about the western allies just as long as list you have written there, actually we can write a list that long just out of the countries the US has bombed since WW2
Injecting Syphlis, plutonium into its own people, radiaqion test son its own troops, the contstant rumours surrounding Clinton and Bush.

If it wasnt for the US, Britian etc Saddam wouldnt of been there is the first place, in any war yo u will hear about the atrocities that t e other side are commiting, you seldom hear about what you're side is up to.

Even my own little coutry in war time (or pacific island suppressing time as we have ben known to do ) has been up to some real dodgey stuff, Im sad to admit it but the govt down in the pacific arent much better.


So it looks like a case of the pot calling the kettle black to me.

"We can all sit here and list out things about the western allies just as long as list you have written there"

LETS SEE YOUR PROOF

A typical Tactic you take a position

And Defend it with an unobstantisted statement

Wheres you conviction ?

Lets see it...........

If you dont want to discuss .....then Dont Post Crap

This is a discussion forum not for ofhand comments

I wish that All you Idylic dreamers would stop posting
political topics