It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SteveR
Ofcourse. I feel for him. His nation is going to be attacked pretty soon, no doubt about it.
Originally posted by Reality Hurts
Hold up a second here. A politician states something, and you take it at face value? Politicians lie, its what they do, regardless if they're from Iran, America, the UK, Bulgaria, or where ever else. Do you really think this Iranian President would come out and say, "Yes, we want this technology for nuclear weapons" ? That'd be absurd, and so is believing him if he says, "No, we don't want nuclear weapons".
It amazes me that a board comprised almost exclusively of skeptics and conspiracy theorists, who don't believe anything that the President of the United States or any member of his administration says, can take Ahmadinejad at his word.
What ever happened to "deny ignorance"? Or is that just a couple of buzz words that only apply when it fits into an agenda?
Originally posted by kozmo
with regimes that support and fund terrorism! Good GOD people! Where have you been for the past 5 years!? yeah, let's take this LIAR for his word - just like he has denied funding Hammas and Hezbollah or arming Hezbollah during the last conflict with Israel!? Come on! DENY IGNORANCE!!! To put faith into ANYTHING this man is saying is folly to say the least.
Question: Why are people rushing to defend Iran and becoming apologists for their insistance on enriching uranium? The United States has liberated more people and contributed more aid than any other nation in the world, yet WE are the bad guys? There just cannot be that many stupid people in the world - can there be?
Originally posted by deltaboy
If its peaceful, why are many of the facilities in underground hardened areas built to withstand any possible airstrikes. Sounds more like preventing anybody from interfering their objective which is the bomb.
Originally posted by SteveR
Maybe because the US is dominating all sides of their border? And has already decimated two Middle Eastern countries? I don't blame them for taking precautions.
Originally posted by SteveR
I do, however you may have missed the recent report from the IAEA that they beleive Iran is no nuclear threat. The US ignored it (obviously).
Originally posted by SteveR
Which one are you looking at?
(not one line)
Originally posted by SteveR
G. 27. "Has been providing access to nuclear material and facilities."
I think they've done enough. As I was going to say earlier, the IAEA (or rather the US) wants to see everything, all of their records and information included. That to me is invading the right of privacy.
27. Iran has been providing the Agency with access to nuclear material and facilities, and has
provided the required reports. Although Iran has provided the Agency with some information
concerning product assays at PFEP, Iran continues to decline Agency access to certain operating
records at PFEP.
28. Iran has not addressed the long outstanding verification issues or provided the necessary
transparency to remove uncertainties associated with some of its activities. Iran has not suspended its
enrichment related activities; nor has Iran acted in accordance with the provisions of the Additional
Protocol.
29. The Agency will continue to pursue its investigation of all remaining outstanding issues relevant
to Iran’s nuclear activities. However, the Agency remains unable to make further progress in its efforts
to verify the correctness and completeness of Iran’s declarations with a view to confirming the
GOV/2006/53
Page 6
peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear programme. The Director General will continue to report as
appropriate.