It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blobby
just a thought, maybe they don't need it now as new secret technology has been invented to replace its function of alert, and possible even protection from incoming air bourne missiles, possible particle beam star wars grid, scalar weapons ready to sink enemy country's if they try and nuke us, who knows I'm sure all those trillions pumped into defense must of come up with loads of top secret technology and breakthroughs in science. I do get the feeling we are ready and we are trying to push things to the limit so we could wipe our enemys out and maybe start new world order alot of odd things going on as of late in the world.
[edit on 30-7-2006 by blobby]
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
somewhere bigger, better, safer has been established.
To accomplish its aerospace warning and control mission, NORAD is divided into three regions: Alaskan NORAD Region, with headquarters at Elmendorf AFB; Canadian NORAD Region, with headquarters at Winnipeg, Manitoba; and Continental U.S. NORAD Region, with headquarters at Tyndall AFB, Fla.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Tim did you read the entire thread? You don’t need this but just for good measure NORAD stands for North American Aerospace Defense Command, now that organization itself is not closing down, the current facility in which they operate from located inside Cheyenne Mountain in Colorado will be "closed". It will be preserved, occupied by support staff and kept on a one-hour stand by. Now the new facility that NORAD is moving into is located at Peterson AFB near Colorado Springs. The main three reasons for the move are listed below.
Originally posted by ghost
If someone wanted to crash an airplane into NORRAD HQ, they won't give us a 1 hour notice to move back into the mountain!
The Pentagon was hit by terrorist, what makes you think they wouldn't try to hit NORAD?
Originally posted by ghost
In a post 9/11 world, can we really afford to take that chance?
Originally posted by blobby
Really i don't think thats true the way Russia and China act sometimes, anyone in power I'm sure could do a preemptive nuke strike am i correct? what if one day they went insane and decide today is a good day for nuclear war?
Originally posted by RF Squibbles
Cuba still has missles pointed at right pat…
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Originally posted by RF Squibbles
Cuba still has missles pointed at right pat…
Do you mean that Cuba has or had, missiles pointed at Wright-Patterson AFB in Dayton Ohio?
[edit on 3-8-2006 by WestPoint23]
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Having NORAD deters others from attacking this country. By others I mean the big
players like China and Cuba ... nuclear missile players. When we have a highly
defended and defendable military bunker that controls information and security
then it is a major reason that these other countries may not hit us at all.
Peace through strength.
When the bad guys see us strong, and NORAD is definately strength, then they are
less likely to hit us with their nukes.
As far as wanting to live through a nuclear war ... I don't know if that's possible for
the majority of Americans. Living where I do - just outside Philly - we'd vaporize
anyways.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Originally posted by ghost
In a post 9/11 world, can we really afford to take that chance?
In a post 9/11 world it’s a very small chance.
Originally posted by ghost
Strange! Didn't they say the same thing after the end of the cold war?
Originally posted by ghost
Before 9/11 everyone said the chance of the US being attacked on our own soil was very small!
Originally posted by ghost
The last time we let our arrogence interfer with sound policy based on caution, it costed over 5'000 lives! Arrogence is very dangerous.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Originally posted by ghost
Strange! Didn't they say the same thing after the end of the cold war?
Can’t recall, was a young lad back then but if they did they must have been referring to the former USSR.
…By a foreign nation yes, it was, and still is, and the chance of us being attacked by a terrorist organization is still there. However what I meant was that the chance of a terrorist successfully "attacking" NORAD is very slim. Again, moving NORAD will not mean that capabilities will be lost, nor does it mean that NORAD is more susceptible to attack from terrorists.
Originally posted by ghost
The last time we let our arrogence interfer with sound policy based on caution, it costed over 5'000 lives! Arrogence is very dangerous.
Its not arrogance, if we were arrogant we wouldn’t have reformed the way we monitor and respond to "threats".
Originally posted by ghost
How do you not see arrogence here?
Originally posted by ghost
I respect your oppinion, but I can't follow your logic!
Originally posted by ghost
I was still in elementry school when the USSR colapsed and the Clod War ended.