It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Redrawing the map of the Middle East?

page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 25 2006 @ 05:56 AM
Haven't seen this up anywhere so I thought I'd bring it to light:

"International borders are never completely just. But the degree of injustice they inflict upon those whom frontiers force together or separate makes an enormous difference — often the difference between freedom and oppression, tolerance and atrocity, the rule of law and terrorism, or even peace and war. "

Now in my opinion this is a bizarre notion. The Allies did alot of messing about in the Middle East post WW1 and WW2, and now someone is putting forward an idea to screw it up again under the notion that "If everyone lives in their own ethnic state, they'll all get along"!

It strikes me as a very simplistic view of human character, how will some nations (i.e.Pakistan) respond to losing around half it's territory? "The most difficult question (for Iran) being whether or not it should keep the port of Bandar Abbas or surrender it to the Arab Shia State." and therefore have no access to the Gulf? Access that they've had since Achaemenid times! The changes (even though they are probably conjectural) would be unlikely to go down well, and probably only exacerbate the strife we have now.

new topics

log in