It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
The building was 95% air. That air had to go somewhere.
Have you ever seen demolition charges go off? They don't form long lasting jets of dust.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by HowardRoark
The building was 95% air. That air had to go somewhere.
The building was composed of 95% air?
Source, please?
Originally posted by Masisoar
The squibs still don't get explained away as just released air pressure,
Originally posted by Masisoar
Yeah but at that type of air pressure in the building Howard, if it was enough to knock that guy off his feet, wouldn't it cause substantial damage to the windows and cause a lot of blow outs on a global scale rather than just a few isolated incidents on the lower floors?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Have you ever seen demolition charges go off? They don't form long lasting jets of dust.
Oh I beg to differ.
1) That is a demolition.
2) There are streams of dust coming out of the side.
How long those last in the air is more dependent upon how much dust, etc. there is than anything else.
[edit on 27-6-2006 by bsbray11]
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by HowardRoark
The building was 95% air. That air had to go somewhere.
The building was composed of 95% air?
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Those windows were built to withstand hurcaine force winds, but some of them would have weakened over time. It happens all the time.
Originally posted by Christophera
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by HowardRoark
The building was 95% air. That air had to go somewhere.
The building was composed of 95% air?
It is a distortion implying that the structure was made from air when it simply contained air.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Those windows were built to withstand hurcaine force winds, but some of them would have weakened over time. It happens all the time.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Were some of those from the air intakes on mechanical floors?
On other floors, there were probably windows that were weaker than the others. Those windows were built to withstand hurcaine force winds, but some of them would have weakened over time. It happens all the time.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
4 inch slabs plus another couple of inches for ducts, ceiling tiles, etc. hell I'll give you a foot.
12 feet span floor to floor, 1/12=.08 bulk and .92 air.
OK, 92% air.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
The building is already falling in that picture. The demo charges have gone off well before that. Those are streams of dust from the collapsing floors.
On other floors, there were probably windows that were weaker than the others. Those windows were built to withstand hurcaine force winds, but some of them would have weakened over time. It happens all the time.
Where did I state that the building was made of air?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by HowardRoark
4 inch slabs plus another couple of inches for ducts, ceiling tiles, etc. hell I'll give you a foot.
12 feet span floor to floor, 1/12=.08 bulk and .92 air.
OK, 92% air.
Howard. That's not mass. That's area.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
No, I never said it was mass. And it's not area, It's volume.
The building was 90% or so air by volume. There, you happy?
Originally posted by Masisoar
Why just one or two windows in each area? If there was that much pressure being thrown down through the buildings, and the "squib" was from air pressure, wouldn't such a force be enough to knock out a bunch of windows around the area being compressed?
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Were some of those from the air intakes on mechanical floors?
On other floors, there were probably windows that were weaker than the others. Those windows were built to withstand hurcaine force winds, but some of them would have weakened over time. It happens all the time.
Originally posted by Fiverz
It is just my belief that a building of 113? floors would have taken so much time/work/visability to PROPERLY DEMO TO THE POINT OF PERFECT DOWNWARD COLLAPSE that it isn't a possible explanation for the towers' falls.