It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
Let’s say NK launches the missile towards the US or its allies.
NK Missile Warhead Found in Alaska
The warhead of a long-range missile test-fired by North Korea was found in the U.S. state of Alaska, a report to the National Assembly revealed yesterday.
"According to a U.S. document, the last piece of a missile warhead fired by North Korea was found in Alaska,’’ former Japanese foreign minister Taro Nakayama was quoted as saying in the report. "Washington, as well as Tokyo, has so far underrated Pyongyang’s missile capabilities.’’
Originally posted by WestPoint23
This is exactly what Missile Defense was designed for, single launches of long range missiles from rogue states, whether or not it will work as advertised depends. We can detect, track and target their ICBM(s) without much effort but intercepting it is a bit tricky. If they just launch a single warhead with no countermeasures then we could probably hit it with a ground launched interceptor or two. However if they launch a fairly sophisticated warhead with multiple bogeys and countermeasure systems then we might not be able to intercept it. Now, before you get exited, I doubt the US will fire anything, if launched the Taepodong-2 will likely just splash down somewhere in the pacific not warranting a response from the US. If the predicted trajectory places the ICBM near Alaska or Hawaii however we may see a response.
The warhead of a long-range missile test-fired by North Korea was found in the U.S. state of Alaska, a report to the National Assembly revealed yesterday...
Originally posted by WestPoint23
You think so Jim? What kind of capabilities does Japan have, in terms of ABM systems? I don’t think the US would shoot it down if it over flew Japan.
Originally posted by Souljah
Let's say that North Korea Already LANDED a Missile on US...
NK Missile Warhead Found in Alaska
Originally posted by chaosrain
The question is not what will happen after the U.S. Missile Shield destroys the North Korean launched Taepodong-2, but what will happen if the U.S. Missile Shield is unable to destroy it's target?
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
Cannot find much in the war of US response to this missile in Alaska.
www.navyseals.com...
Can we be SURE this report is reliable?
Newspaper says N. Korean missile pieces found in Alaska
Officials puzzled, say closest one splashed down hundreds of miles off coast
Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, said Tuesday he's never heard of such a thing. Neither had Chris Nelson, the state's missile defense coordinator.
Air Force Lt. Col. Rick Lehner, spokesman for the Missile Defense Agency, said the report probably referred to a three-stage missile tested by North Korea in 1998.
"It splashed in the water hundreds of miles from Alaska," Lehner said. "I've never heard of any piece of a missile landing in Alaska from that test or any other test."
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Chaosrain You’re assuming that the North Koreas have an intention to hit US soil, which they most surly do not. As such there is no need for the US to shoot anything down if all it’s going to do is fall into the Pacific.
By the way ABM tests weren’t rigged because the position, trajectory or velocity were know, FYI you at least need to know that to even attempt an intercept and we can attain those three pieces of information without needing to rig anything. What many people consider rigging are tests in which a single non-maneuvering warhead with no countermeasures is intercepted. So like I said before if that’s what North Korea launches, and I suspect it will be then we have a good probability of intercept. And ABM systems have had more than limited success.