It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
you clearly dont believe what simon etal have stated previously about the history of ATS , why would you believe any further statements they make ???
sir -- i have met your sort before , and your motives and methods disgust me
you sir -- are a muck raking troll -- and you want dirt on ATS but are not prepared to dig yourself .
shame on you .
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong
I dont see Springer thanking you yet,
and i do care, because this is my board home... i devote my side time to it, and have developed some great threads of research...
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
I don't understand why this would need to be public. Could you not U2U them ? I am sure they would have worked with you.
I would think after the last episode you would have U2Ued them.
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
I think the owners of ATS would rather, people judge for themselves. There is no fear of the truth.
.........
You (the reader) decide which logic you respect or trust.
Originally posted by Spiderj
First rdube let me say, wow really good work you've obviously put a lot of time into this. It really is one of the great conspiracies.
COULD Abovetopsecret be a government project such as is described in this paper? Sure - why not? Is it? That's what we need to find out now, isn't it?
It's a very interesting point but this would seem to be a very wide net being thrown out...though instead of infiltrating a group you make a group to be infiltrated by those individuals you wish to observe.
Springer helped you with the bandwith to get the interview streamed...would someone working an op do that? Maybe maybe not, arguments could be made both ways.
I personally don't think ATS is any government op. I also think it wouldn't be a very good conspiracy site if there wasn't a conspiracy about the conspiracy site, oroboros and all that.
Good work, and again I know my input doesn't count but I had two cents so there they are.
Spiderj
Who cares? either way id still ocme here an dhang out. Interesting stuff on here, CointelPro or not
Originally posted by rdube02
All of the points you bring up concerning Laura and her website are absolutely true, and I'm glad to see it pointed out here. However she's spread this nonsense freely for some time without any counter from ATS (as far as I could see) - and I'd like to see ATS kill these rumors once and for all.
-Ry
Who cares? either way id still ocme here an dhang out. Interesting stuff on here, CointelPro or not
Originally posted by Springer
His intention was to have a public disproval of something utterly unworthy of a public display of any sort. An honest mistake.
[edit on 6-15-2006 by Springer]
originally posted by Shawnna:
Personally, it's sad that ATS's position within Google searches ends up dictating what is, and is not, discussed within ATS. Seems to me that this will ultimately have an impact on the quality of the discussions at some point.
Always,
Shawnna
Originally posted by Majic
The Never-Ending Conspiracy
Those who claim that ATS is some sort of government operation are effectively claiming that I'm complicit in it by being a staff member.
Originally posted by Shawnna
Seems to me that this will ultimately have an impact on the quality of the discussions at some point.
Originally posted by kode
It’s only bloody natural for a healthily paranoid individual to question who he or she is really dealing with. Is it not?
Originally posted by Shawnna
Seems to me that this will ultimately have an impact on the quality of the discussions at some point.
I don’t think you could ever knock this site down, like a good thread it will always come back.
It’s only bloody natural for a healthily paranoid individual to question who he or she is really dealing with. Is it not?