It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Odium
Muaddib, which part of it do you not understand? I really thought it was fairly common sense what I posted. It is in fact, what a lot of big business does and it is why they open up companies and factories in other Nations.
Originally posted by rich23
..............
The US media has clearly succeeded in demonising Chavez, who doesn't deserve this.
A little scrutiny of a recent Associated Press report about Venezuela provides a lesson in how the English-language press often gets the story wrong. Take the first sentence: "President Hugo Chavez said Saturday that Venezuelan voters should have the chance to decide whether he should govern the country for the next 25 years."
No, such a referendum would not be about "whether he should govern the country for the next 25 years." A referendum would be about whether Chavez would be permitted to run every six years and --in the event that he were to continue winning elections-- serve multiple presidential terms. The AP report's opening sentence makes it sound as if such a referendum would do away with elections in Venezuela, as if its intent would be to grant Chavez a new 25-year term in office! The website of The Calgary Sun even titles the wire report "Chavez seeking 25-year term"!!
This is obviously an extremely poor piece of reporting. Chavez made it clear that, if the opposition committed to participating in the upcoming presidential election, he would not convoke a referendum to end presidential term limits. He explained that the intent of his threat to convoke such a referendum was not to perpetuate himself in power but rather to defend the Bolivarian Revolution.
Fortunately, Agence France Press (AFP) got the story right. The opening sentence of AFP's Spanish-language report reads, "Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez claimed Saturday that, if the opposition decides not to run candidates in the December presidential election, he could decree a referendum to permit his reelection for multiple terms until 2031."
Originally posted by Muaddib
You made a claim with no information to back your claim. It does not make it true unless you have some real information to back it up.
Originally posted by Odium
Which part though?
Do you honestly believe that Russia, will build the factories, send men to them, send their own resources and then say: "Here you go!". Come on...lmao
Russian Official Urges New World Financial System Without Dominating Currencies
Created: 13.06.2006 15:25 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 15:25 MSK
MosNews
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, who is often viewed as one of President Putin’s possible successors, said on Tuesday, June 13, that the modern world needs a new stable financial system, in which there will be no dominating currencies. Medvedev was speaking at the 10th Economic forum in St. Petersburg.
At present, dramatic fluctuations of the exchange rates of world currencies put in jeopardy not only the economies of individual countries, but also the world order in general, Medvedev said. In his opinion, the situation cannot remain like that forever. New leaders of world development with their new, stable currencies are coming to the limelight, which will inevitably bring about changes in the financial system too, Medvedev continued. “This is for the coming generations to decide whether or not a new international currency will be created,” he said, quoted by the Itar-Tass agency.
Originally posted by rich23
.....
As usual, when one looks at a story claiming to demonstrate how evil Chavez is, it turns out to be spin. And yet it's fine to try and thwart the democratic will of the Venezuelan people by ousting him in a coup, or to call for his assassination like Pat Robertson. What a hypocritical bunch of BS.
Chavez suggests vote on extension of presidency to 2031
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said Saturday that he would hold a referendum asking the Venezuelans to decide whether he should extend his presidency until 2031 if the opposition pull out of December's presidential election.
"I am going to call a referendum. I am going to ask you, all the people if you agree with Chavez being president until 2031," said Chavez at a stadium to his supporters in the central Lara state.
Originally posted by Muaddib
As we can see, part of the plan they appear to have in mind, and which concurs with what several military defectors from Russia have been saying, they want to get rid of the old economies, and want to create new ones. I wonder why...
Originally posted by DYepes
Well Maudibb, I believe, given the current situations in the world, seeing as it is not perfect and can be argued at one of the worst periods in human history, that policies and ideologies of the rulers of the world have not changed much in half a century, that perhaps they want to get rid of the old economies because it would be nice to have a change in the world? People who are afraid of change sound like the people who are afraid to lose power.
..............
Originally posted by rich23
I'd like to know what was the source of Xinhua's article. If, as is overwhelmingly likely, it is one of the opposition's media outlets (the opposition in Venezuela owning something like 90% of the media there) I'd like a better source than that.
If Chavez is such a dictator, how come he never shuts down opposition media? Having seen The Revolution Will Not Be Televised, I frankly have no doubt that the opposition has no compunction about lying to discredit him, and therefore I'd want to see the Venezuelan source of this story.
El presidente de Venezuela, Hugo Chávez, ha anunciado este sábado su intención de convocar un referéndum nacional para consultar su permanencia en el poder hasta el año 2031 en caso de que la oposición rechaze presentar candidatos para las presidenciales de finales de año.
"Si ellos invocan alguna excusa, rechazando reconocer la victoria, o se retiran antes [del escrutinio], convocaré un referéndum, a través de un decreto y aunque me acusen de querer perpetuarme en el poder, le voy a preguntar a ustedes, a todo el pueblo, ¿está usted de acuerdo en que Chávez sea el presidente de Venezuela hasta el 2031?, ¿sí o no?", ha asegurado el presidente, ante un estadio lleno de simpatizantes en el central estado de Lara.
La Constitución venezolana, votada en 1999, únicamente autoriza un segundo mandato presidencial, pero ésto se podría modificar mediante un referéndum.
Habrá que esperar a ver si Chávez se refiere a organizar una votación cuyos resultados tengan carácter de obligatoriedad para eliminar los límites a la reelección o si está proponiendo un plebiscito. Antes de que Chávez llegara al escenario, miles de sus simpatizantes coreaban: "¡Uh, ah, Chávez no se va!".
Originally posted by DYepes
Great Britain has a friggin Queen that the UK and several other autonomous territories have declared allegiance to for decades.
...........................................
I just do not see it happening. One thing has nothing to do with another.
The Queen is Head of State in the United Kingdom.
As a constitutional monarch, The Queen does not 'rule' the country, but fulfils important ceremonial and formal roles with respect to the Parliament of the United Kingdom, and the devolved assemblies of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
After two controversial years at the helm of oil-rich Venezuela, President Hugo Chavez appears to have finally taken the leap into what some are calling the Cubanization of his country.
During a speech Sunday, Chavez called on his supporters to form Cuban-style neighborhood watchdog groups -- "on every corner, on every block" -- in a move to insulate his leftist Bolivarian Revolution from criticism.
Recently in his speeches, Chávez has been urging people to read Trotsky’s “The Permanent Revolution,” noting there is much to learn from it and that Trotsky was correct in his arguments with Stalin. “There is no national revolution,” insists Chávez. For a nation’s revolutionary process to survive and advance “the revolution must become international.”
The magnetism of the Permanent Revolution
By Celia Hart
Wednesday, 15 September 2004
The following is a paper given at the workshop "The utopia that we need" sponsored by the Bolivar Marti Faculty, September 10, 2004, Central Havana. Translation to English for CubaNews by Ana Portela.
......................
And when we reach port? The port is in the stars. Someone said once that triumphs are only an excuse to oil the rifles and continue forward. Che did not say it. But he did it …
To what extent is the revolution permanent? Is it perhaps an attack of that fighter that killed Stalinism in Coyoacan, as so many others)? Perhaps rhetorically to handicap the proletariat from taking power, as many believe? We have lived this farce for decades. The permanent revolution does not refer to a simultaneous revolution. In fact, he who headed the Red Army in 1917 was Leon Trotsky. The one who first predicted the October proletarian revolution was Leon Trotsky. The permanent revolution is the only viable form of making a socialist revolution on an international scale. And this is the only scale that promotes the development of the Socialism we need, much more than the lost island of Saint Tomas Moro.
Originally posted by DYepes
.............
Seriously man its just pure fantasy warmongering to believe Russia and China are out to create a massive war with America. Those books are not so different than many war scenarios and plans the Pentagon has tucked away. Our country has plans tucked away for any possible invasion from pretty much every nation on Earth, and am sure they have documents on the technecalities of invading countless other nations across the planet for whatever reason. Just about every developed nation on Earth has plans as such.
Originally posted by DYepes
The world wants peace not war, and the only ones preaching war are either religous fanatics preaching false beliefs, and American citizens who believe socialist ideas are complete evil that can not even be considered at any cost, and would probably persecute and jail those who discuss it if it were legal.
XVI Festival Mundial de la Juventud y los Estudiantes
Venezuela Agosto 2005
Llama Chávez a una ofensiva mundial por el Socialismo
Caracas, 13 ago (AIN) El presidente venezolano Hugo Chávez llamó hoy a apurar el paso en una ofensiva mundial para construir el Socialismo del siglo XXI, y aseguró que existen las circunstancias y todo indica que es tiempo del renacimiento de la esperanza y acción de las masas.
Se trata de salvar al planeta del la amenaza del imperialismo y del capitalismo, para que el futuro de nuestros hijos no sea la barbarie sino el mundo de la felicidad, de la igualdad y la justicia, agregó en su intervención ante delegados al XVI Festival Mundial de la Juventud que tiene por sede a esta ciudad.
................
Recordó a Ernesto Che Guevara y la frase ‘’ El presente es de lucha el futuro nos pertenece’’, y prosiguió: yo me atrevo a decir, el presente es de lucha, el futuro está amenazado, hay una espada gigantesca de Damocles apuntando a la cabeza del futuro, y exhortó a luchar para evitar el degollamiento del futuro. ¡Salvémoslo!
Hagamos lo que tengamos que hacer como individuo y colectivo, para que puedan decir de nosotros ‘’la Historia nos absolvió’’ , y para que dentro de unos 50 años ustedes puedan no solo decir esa frase sino también ‘’hemos salvado a la humanidad’’, concluyó.
Global offensive
I believe it is time that we take up with courage and clarity a political, social, collective and ideological offensive across the world — a real offensive that permits us to move progressively, over the next years, the next decades, leaving behind the perverse, destructive, destroyer, capitalist model and go forward in constructing the socialist model to avoid barbarism and beyond that the annihilation of life on this planet.
I believe this idea has a strong connection with reality. I don’t think we have much time. Fidel Castro said in one of his speeches I read not so long ago, “tomorrow could be too late, let’s do now what we need to do”. I don't believe that this is an exaggeration. The environment is suffering damage that could be irreversible — global warming, the greenhouse effect, the melting of the polar ice caps, the rising sea level, hurricanes — with terrible social occurrences that will shake life on this planet.
..............
It is the moment of offensive, of the masses, of struggle, of battle. It is a new moment we have now and we don't know if we will have another moment later. We don’t know if we will have time.
I believe there is not enough time to wait 50 years for another moment so advantageous like this one to advance in the global struggle against imperialism, against imperialist hegemony and for the creation of new paths, the opening of new paths.
Originally posted by DYepes
..............
I personally think we should merge the two taking the best of both and leaving out the negatives.