It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Originally posted by grover
great! smart move donald...we stop applying the geneva convention but watch us howl if others treat us the same. damned neo-cons think the rules do not apply to them....fools.
Yeah US troops have always gotten such great treatment when they were POWs before and after geneva convention.
The Japanese in WW2 the Korean in the Korean war and the VC in Vietnam they all followed the geneva convention so great when they had American POW. Now the Islamic fighters yeah they treat POWs great.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Someone can walk away from the humiliation of being threatened by a snarling dog. It is impossible to walk away from a beheading.
Is it too unreasonable to expect them to draft reasonable responses also?
Originally posted by Gools
Either that or they know exactly what they are doing.
Originally posted by justin_barton3
people we are playing by the rules in iraq at the moment more or less and look whats happening. we need to do something drastic to stop the kidnappings and suicide bombers and if that means we have to torture the enemy then im all for that. i would far rather iraqi terrorists get tortured than us and british troops and iraqi civillians get killed.
Originally posted by justin_barton3
people we are playing by the rules in iraq at the moment more or less and look whats happening. we need to do something drastic to stop the kidnappings and suicide bombers and if that means we have to torture the enemy then im all for that. i would far rather iraqi terrorists get tortured than us and british troops and iraqi civillians get killed.
justin
Originally posted by The Iconoclast
You completely missed the point, but that is not surprising.
And what is a reasonable response... in their cultural frame? We're in their country and must abide by their rules and customs.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Moral high ground? Or a continuation of death and destruction because we choose to follow “rules” while the other side does not? The choice to me is very obvious.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Moral high ground? Or a continuation of death and destruction because we choose to follow “rules” while the other side does not? The choice to me is very obvious.
Originally posted by jsobecky
No, I didn't, and your response was anticipated. You are saying that we must understand what "humiliation" means to them. I say, they need to wise up and join the civilized world. The days of the scimitar and camel are over.
No we don't need to accept their "culture", as you call it. "Culture" does not include murder of innocents in the name of some apparition, debasement of women, and chopping helpless prisoner's head off.
They need to understand that there are other ways to respond. It's time they joined the 21st century.
Originally posted by The Iconoclast
If you anticipated it, why make the ignorant statement then? If you truly understood what I was saying you would have recognized that they feel like we are preventing them from joining the "civilized" world. You would have recognized that they have the same feelings toward the west as African Americans do towards towards our society. They feel like they have been held down for so long that they have no serious potential of bettering their lot in the world because of their own predisposition to a racist agenda. They have given up "trying" to play by our rules and are striking back in the only way they know. Right or wrong, it's presently the only course of action they see as having a hope.
Who are YOU to tell someone else what is acceptable within their culture? The level of arrogance that statement requires in unfathomable.
I don't personally agree with standards that muslims have chosen to live under, but they have chosen that path.
Originally posted by jsobecky
You're trying to say that they have sat down in good faith at the negotiating table and been double-crossed. Nothing could be further from the truth. They have never played by our rules. They are not trying to join the civilized world; they are trying to suppress freedom of any kind.
And it is very disingenuous of you to lump all African-Americans under the same umbrella. Who are you to act as their spokesman?
You call it arrogance, I call it calling a spade a spade. Who, except for you, believes that intentionally massacaring innocents is an acceptable culture?
Yes you do, or you wouldn't be defending them so vociferously. You may "respect" their murdering ways, but don't ask me to.
Originally posted by grover
If we behave just as vily as our opponant, just because they do, makes us no better. Or more specifically what part of "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" don't you understand?