It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
would you accept the iraqi abuse case as rightful whistle blowing? how about the yellowcake/saddam thing? if the action is illegal yet its classified where do you stand then?
Originally posted by grimreaper797
you do know corruption runs rampade, so would you really risk it by telling say the FBI? face it, when whistleblowing on government actions, you dont go to an agency government run. you go to a source as far away from government affiliated as possible. whistleblowing can be life threatening depending on the situation, do you really want to risk it by telling "the proper authorities" when they are close knit with the government. the press is the safest route because it will catch wind the quickest, people will find out the quickest. If that action is illegal, it has every reason to be found out and not be classified.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Corruption does not run that rampant to the point where you cannot tell the proper authorities.
Originally posted by Yumi
JSOBECKY- One of your Homeland Security people was arrested for trying to pick up and have sex with a 14 year old. Marines execute children in Iraq. Your President has had over 30 scandals in six years, several are federal offenses like wiretapping American citizens and lying about WMDs in Iraq.
So are you going to your pedophile boss with a complaint? The marine who just got done shooting a 11 year old girl? Or the president who just got caught in another lie?
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by grimreaper797
would you accept the iraqi abuse case as rightful whistle blowing? how about the yellowcake/saddam thing? if the action is illegal yet its classified where do you stand then?
Which of those two cases involved leaking classified documents?
A classified illegal action could be a special case that I would not care to comment on. But if you do leak it, you should not leak it to the press, but to the proper authorities. And you should be willing to stand up and admit your action, not hide behind the moniker of "unidentified source".
I'm sure enough knee jerk reaction will erupt to incorrectly conclude that I am in favor of illegal action, that's why I don't care to comment on any specific case.