It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sayswho
Babloyi,
You apparently assume (without basis) that criticism of Islam stems from mantra like much of what is believed and repeated by fundamentalists. Liberals and other critics of gratuitous violence born of ignorance almost always arrive at their conclusions after contemplation. You have seen Bertrand Russell quoted in here, maybe a few of you ought to read him, if only to ‘know your enemy’ so to speak.
Originally posted by golemina
The aggressors are CLEARLY Islamic.
And the conflict is entirely fueled ISLAMIC expansion.
If you look at Darfur and come away with 'The conflict has no Islamic basis'...
I've only got one thing to say...
Thank you for proving my point that propagandists/apologists won't accept ANYTHING as evidence of the evil actions of Muslims (my contention), that the bloodlust emanating from Islam is fueled by the Quran (the thread starters contention).
Originally posted by golemina
>Where is the Islamic basis?
The aggressors are Islamic.
It's an organized campaign.
They're killing people on a massive scale.
Why does the concept of yet another genocidal campaign by Muslims against non-believers bother you so much?
Originally posted by golemina
I do have one question...
>OK, then. I'll bite. Where is the Islamic basis? Show me where it says "It is better to slaughter the farmer than to suffer his presence while shepherding".
You mention the evil actions of muslims. I never disagreed that many times "muslims" have performed evil actions. How does that translate to "bloodlust emanating from islam"? If GWB does lots of crazy things, does that mean there is "bloodlust emanating from Christianity"? Does that mean that every other christian is also harbouring this "bloodlust"? Does this mean that the christian scriptures are also "harbouring this bloodlust"?
Which part of this statement contains the thread that when you pull on it organizes whatever that is into a coherent thought?
Originally posted by skippytjc
Islam poses more of a threat to me and my family right this moment than Christans do.
Originally posted by golemina
In light of your points let me readjust my statement...
It's ALMOST ALL involving Islam vs something or another.
but to look and see what their real behavior...Better don't you think?
thetruththeway
When Bosnia was going thru ethnic clensing Catholics whiped out muslims,
Let's conduct a poll in Darfur.
What is it exactly the Muslims say to their victims when they chop them into little pieces?
sayswho
That's gotta hurt when you're a despot wannabe, huh? Say what? Oh! Republican, sorry!
Why does the concept of yet another genocidal campaign by Muslims against non-believers bother you so much?
What's the accepted signal for mutilated genitalia?
Iwasnerehere
Whats the difference? seems to me the two go hand in hand
Originally posted by golemina
Sorry, Babloyi, you seem to have drifted pretty far off the field. Come back on to the topic...
"12. Kill disbelievers wherever you find them. If they attack you, then kill them. Such is the reward of disbelievers. (But if they desist in their unbelief, then don't kill them.) 2:191-2
Originally posted by Nygdan
Also, in Islam, the unbeleiver, he doesn't go to hell for enternity, he goes to something like christian purgatory, where he is punished and purified, and then enters heaven.
Unlike in christainity, where the unbeleivers are personally murdered and exterminated by a Jebus Army, and tossed into lakes made out of fire for all eternity.
Originally posted by karl 12
How can a specific organised religion's opinion that its followers are somehow more chosen/special/saved/superior to other non-cult members not be inherently bigoted?