It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by magnolia_xx
In the last pics you posted, I see hazel/green eyes in both the pics.
Paul is much taller than Ringo.
By the way, in the last one you can see that Paul's chin is identical to the supposed fake's chin.
Unless Paul's chin was transplanted on Bill Campbell's face - along with his eyelids, his nose, his lips et cetera, and oh, don't forget the vocal cords, I dare to say that Faul is a mere fabrication, and Paul is much alive.
Originally posted by magnolia_xx
OK Faulcon,
you are totally right, Paul is dead and Faul is singing in place of him.
And Ringo is very tall, a huge guy, you know. The tallest among the Fab Four.
I think your opinions cannot be changed whatever happens, actually everything you see is plots and fakes and murders.
Surely if you happened to meet Sir Paul McCartney telling you he is alive
My opinion is that if a lawyer believes in reptilians there's much to worry about.
By the way, a physician (me) does not believe in anything like that. I believe in what I see (or I think to see. It's OK for me, then).
All the blind people here are happy for not sharing your hilarious opinions.
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
[
Do you believe in angels, demons, souls, or God?
[edit on 1-8-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]
Originally posted by seaofgreen
berenike, I think Paul just managed to hold on to his boyish looks a bit longer than most; by the end of '66 though, these had pretty much faded and the growing of a moustache and general lack of shaving thereafter just emphasized this.
Edit: Hey, just noticed Paul's eyes in your pics looking distinctly brown...
[edit on 2-8-2009 by seaofgreen]
Originally posted by berenike
Another point she makes that rings true for me is about Paul having the 'It' factor and Faul lacking it.
Originally posted by seaofgreen
faulconandsnowjob, has it been proved that people can't grow a couple of inches in their early 20s?
And how do you and the scientists explain that afterwards, it looks like we have the real Paul back again?
E.g. here:
Originally posted by berenike
But, here is Paul or Faul in India - and Faulcon pointed out that (in the PID version of events) it was Faul not Paul who went there:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/ba7f84316710.jpg[/atsimg]
It's pictures of this version of Faul/Paul that make me think she's got a point.
[edit on 2-8-2009 by berenike]
Originally posted by aorAki
Originally posted by seaofgreen
E.g. here:
To me, it looks like the first picture has been 'stretched' to accommodate Faul's longer face.
Originally posted by aorAki
Is it possible that I can see scars on his chin, slightly covered by stubble?
There seem to be some definite lines which could be surgical scars?
Originally posted by berenike
To me, this early Paul
could easily have grown up to look like this:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/abea32957244.jpg[/atsimg]