It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
M.K. Davis' frame by frame rendition of the Patterson Film:
This one makes a panoramic picture with the camera following bigfoot with each frame adding to the panoramic picture.
It's a 4mb animated .gif
www.bigfootencounters.com...
This one is pretty amazing (another large .gif), it follows Bigfoot and zooms in on all the hot areas of discussion:
www.bigfootencounters.com...
from
www.bigfootencounters.com...
New extra unseen Patterson footage
In a frame-by-frame analysis of this version, Patterson can be seen pursuing the subject while filming.
A large limb passes in front of the camera and then off to the side.
At this point, Patterson realizes that he can't get an angle on the receding subject, so he back tracks himself, and in doing so, allows the camera to pan the ground. It is here that the camera picks up a barefoot track, complete with mid tarsal pressure ridge that is sunk deeply into the sand. The camera then swings over to reveal the boot prints of Patterson himself.
Large animated .Gif file:
www.bigfootencounters.com...
from
www.bigfootencounters.com...
Originally posted by Busymind
The unmoving tush still has me stumped, though. It just sits there, unmoving; while everything else moves around.
Originally posted by LuDaCrIs
On the show they were interviewing the guy who was supposedly in the suit. It was remarkable. They also had a shot of him walking and it was exactly like the bigfoot in the patterson video.
Originally posted by LuDaCrIs
I recently saw a show on Discovery or National Geographic. I dont quite remember, maybe someone can help me out. On the show they were interviewing the guy who was supposedly in the suit. It was remarkable. They also had a shot of him walking and it was exactly like the bigfoot in the patterson video.
Why are people still convinced by this video?
People have admitted to making it.
I just dont get the "firm" beleivers.
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
These guys could of made millions in Hollywoods FX departments if they could hoax this bigfoot tape in '67 with their own means and no hollywood budget.
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
These guys could of made millions in Hollywoods FX departments if they could hoax this bigfoot tape in '67 with their own means and no hollywood budget.
Originally posted by LuDaCrIs
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
These guys could of made millions in Hollywoods FX departments if they could hoax this bigfoot tape in '67 with their own means and no hollywood budget.
Are you actually serious. That original video footage was horrible. It lookes like something a 15 year old in comm tech class could have made. Thats why they made the digitalized version. They even made that "stabalizing" version. Remember? I am sure you've all seen it on ATS. here
By the way, if that suit is the only thing that convinces you Bigfoot exists, then you're beleif is hanging on by a thread.
[edit on 27-1-2006 by LuDaCrIs]
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
These guys could of made millions in Hollywoods FX departments if they could hoax this bigfoot tape in '67 with their own means and no hollywood budget.