It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by waynos
Using a take off trolley and a skid instead of a normal undercarriage, more than one 163 was destroyed on take off by its own trolley bouncing back up and hitting it. The unthrottleable rocket engine meant that it was always either going too fast to fight effectively, or gliding, and which bright spark decided to install fuel tanks where the highly volatile fuels could freely mix together if the aircraft became inverted?
Originally posted by waynos
My design blunder, for the moment, is the Me 163. On the face of it it was a brilliant and far sighted attempt to put a high speed interceptor to good use, however in its execution it was a terrible cock-up.
Originally posted by waynos
And the Tu-95 and A-4 are design blunders, how exactly