It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Agent47
the loss of some Iraqis AND American Servicemen/women now will help save the future for millions of Iraqis who would have had to suffer under Saddam or his son's down the line.
Originally posted by CIA
Before you take somebody's life, even for his son's good, should you please ask him if he accept your kindness
Originally posted by ImJaded
With all due respect Agent47, U just did it again.
I posted in the tone I did because Souljah always seems to be a target for his postings. I know I'm not gonna read about what he posts on my news broadcasts. And all everyone ever does, besides the few who see that this war was not necessary, all these deaths, civilian or not, are unecessary, is attack him for it.
If U don't like the angle he is coming from, make a post of your own that is from the angle U like, that is what I meant.
Oh and don't worry, Australia is on the same "side" as America. That's where I'm from, apparently what I actually think doesn't matter.
That's what it's all about really ain't it ?
carry on
[edit on 20-12-2005 by ImJaded]
Originally posted by xEphon
I love it when people justify the war by saying we're giving the Iraqis freedom, but at home ours are being taken away
and it all "supposedly" started because of terrorism which Bush stated "we cant win"
Does anyone else find this a little ironic?
I would laugh if it wasnt so sad.
Originally posted by xEphon
I love it when people justify the war by saying we're giving the Iraqis freedom, but at home ours are being taken away
and it all "supposedly" started because of terrorism which Bush stated "we cant win"
Does anyone else find this a little ironic?
I would laugh if it wasnt so sad.
Originally posted by ImJaded
Agent47, I read U loud and clear. I see everyone's points and just try my best to digest all information. I did not intend to start arguing, never that, just wanted to point that out.
Originally posted by Agent47
You have way too much of a biased one sided view of this whole conflict. In war people make mistakes and sometimes civilians pay the price but that is a long ways from purposely making munitions that look harmless and could be picked up by any unsuspecting individual. Get a grip, you can't try and say the insurgency doesn't exist and you can't say that we purposely bomb homes.
Originally posted by Souljah
Tell me - why is it that EVERYTIME that Coalition troops kill civilans that is called either:
1. a MISTAKE
2. an ACCIDENT
3. COLLATERAL DAMAGE
It is more then obvious that Coalition troops do not care for the Iraqi civilans casualtues, because they do not DO BODYCOUNTS!
Originally posted by Agent47
They are called mistakes because they are quite simply mistakes and when they are not either military justice or the media investigates and punishes those who violated the rules of war.
And yes the coalition doesn't perform body counts on Iraqis because what may clearly be the corpse of a guy holding an Ak47 or IED will no doubt be spun into an innocent civilian by various Islamofacist extremists.
Originally posted by Souljah
Originally posted by Agent47
They are called mistakes because they are quite simply mistakes and when they are not either military justice or the media investigates and punishes those who violated the rules of war.
So, how many times do you think the Coalition troops have Violated these Rules of War?
In my Opinion, your answer is going to be: "NONE".
The Coalition do not count the Dead Iraqi Civilans - because "it is a Waste of time". The Coalition is therefore breaking United Nations charter, guilty of violating international law, and guilty of crimes against Humanity.
When will they be Punished?
Originally posted by Agent47
In fact in one of my posts with ImJaded I pointed out how an artilllery officer was courtmartialed after shooting a dying iraqi in the head because he thought it was the only thing he could do to end the man's suffering (from a fatal wound).
Once again get a grip. The UN has been pretty oppossed to this war and isn't the biggest supporter of the Coalitions work in Iraq. If the coalition were so guilty of war crimes wouldn't the UN possibly just maybe say something?
Originally posted by mad scientist
LOL, just where did you hear that Considering there are only 26 million Iraqi's, you're saying that almost half are in the Shiite militia, come on enough of the BS
Originally posted by WestPoint23
And Souljah you know absolutely nothing about military service, so your “Soldiers don’t do nothing without Generals” is BS.
I’ll let other members who have actually served to explain that to you though.
Originally posted by Agent47
And here you go with the oil thing, honestly if you researched it you would find how awful the system of oil production is in Iraq. Saddam really let the oil production go to hell over the years and if we honestly wanted to invade a country for oil we could have invaded one with much more up to date production methods (see Kuwait).