It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AcesInTheHole
In my opinion, stealth technology would not be needed if you were able to fly at incredible speeds. Who cares if they see you if they have no weapons or craft that can catch you?
I don't think you will be able to get much in the way of tracking/fire control data from such systems but i suppose it may serve countries who do not have the extensive designed air defenses of the RF..
Originally posted by Canada_EH
Originally posted by AcesInTheHole
In my opinion, stealth technology would not be needed if you were able to fly at incredible speeds. Who cares if they see you if they have no weapons or craft that can catch you?
The problem is that in the not so distance future there could be fielded lazer type weapons. If and or when that happens all your speed means nothing.
That was how the F-117 worked and the B-2 still does and unless the F-22 can fly sorties at a tremendous rate in all weather not much has changed.
Or by hopelessly outdated barely in service radars.
Originally posted by PisTonZOR
I am extremely disapointed that the USAF is only getting, 180 Raptors! There was originally going to be something like 300.
Originally posted by PisTonZOR
I am extremely disapointed that the USAF is only getting, 180 Raptors! There was originally going to be something like 300.
Stellar, you know as well as I know that there WAS a reason for the F-117 getting shot down. But it does go to show that occasionally a Stealth aircraft may be detected.
Everyone, Stealth does NOT mean invisible.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Originally posted by StellarX
Stellar, you know as well as I know that there WAS a reason for the F-117 getting shot down. But it does go to show that occasionally a Stealth aircraft may be detected.
Everyone, Stealth does NOT mean invisible.
So you don't believe the Wesley Clarke when he say that it was tracked and shot down? Any specific reason why they 'may' be detected instead of being tracked all the time?
F117 shoot down was mere luck and atrocious planning
By way of example, they noted that even a standard turning maneuver could increase the aircraft’s radar cross section by a factor of 100 or more. Such turns were unavoidable in the constricted airspace within which the F-117s had to fly.15 Another unconfirmed report suggested that the RC-135 Rivet Joint aircraft monitoring enemy SAM activity may have failed to locate the SA-3 battery thought to have downed the F-117 and may not have relayed timely indications of enemy SAM activity to the appropriate C2 authorities. Lending credence to that interpretation, Gen Richard Hawley, commander of Air Combat Command at the time, commented that “when you have a lot of unlocated threats, you are at risk even in a stealth airplane.”
Although the Air Force has remained understandably silent about the confluence of events it believes occasioned the F-117’s downing, according to press reports, Air Force assessors concluded, after conducting a formal postmortem, that a lucky combination of low-technology tactics, rapid learning, and astute improvisation had converged in one fleeting instant to enable an SA-3 not operating in its normal, radar-guided mode to down the aircraft. Undoubtedly, enemy spotters in Italy reported the aircraft’s takeoff from Aviano, and IADS operators in Serbia, as well as those in Bosnia and along the Montenegrin coast, could have assembled enough glimpses of its position en route to its target from scattered radars to cue a SAM battery near Belgrade to fire at the appropriate moment. The aircraft had already dropped one laser-guided bomb (LGB) near Belgrade, offering the now-alerted air defenders yet another clue. (The Air Force is said to have ruled out theories hinging on a stuck weapons-bay door, a descent to below 15,000 feet, or a hit by AAA.)17
Allegedly, at least three procedural errors contributed to the downing.18 First, ELINT collectors reportedly could not track the changing location of the three or four offending SAM batteries. Three low-frequency Serb radars that could have detected the F-117’s presence, at least theoretically, were not neutralized because US strike aircraft had earlier bombed the wrong aiming points within the radar complexes. Also, F-16CJs carrying HARMs and operating in adjacent airspace could have deterred the SA-3 battery from emitting, but those aircraft had been recalled before the F-117 shootdown.
The second alleged procedural error entailed an EA-6B support jammer that was operating too far away from the F-117 (80 to 100 miles) to offer much protection. Furthermore, it was out of proper alignment with the offending threat radars, resulting in inefficient jamming.
Last, F-117s operating out of Aviano had previously flown along more or less the same transit routes for four nights in a row (because of SACEUR’s ban on overflight of Bosnia) to avoid jeopardizing the Dayton Accords. That would have made their approach pattern into Yugoslav airspace predictable. Knowing the direction the F-117s would take, Serb air defenders could have employed low-frequency radars for the best chance of getting a snap look at the aircraft. Former F-117 pilots and several industry experts acknowledged that the aircraft is detectable by such radars when viewed from the side or directly below. US officials also suggested that the Serbs may have gotten brief, nightly radar hits while the aircraft’s weapons bay doors opened fleetingly.
Originally posted by h3akalee
...turned out to be a F117. They were even able to track it with the sytem now i heard that the guys tracking it got in a great deal of trouble.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
You mean when he said that someone was passing information to the Serbs about missions including the stealth tasking orders that included routes, times, altitudes, targets, call signs, etc?
As for reasons for being detected there are probably a good dozen or two for why.
They include antennas/lights being extended, bomb bays/wheel well doors not completely sealed, doors open, aircraft flew through rain (for the F-117), skin oil on RAM (F-117), etc.
Originally posted by pepsi78
stelth can be beaten by advance sofisticated radars, 2 radiowaves from different directions are sent out on a intersect course, if the 2 radiowaves fail to intersect then the stealth plane is blocking them and stealth is detected.
Recently this has been done not with 2 radar stations but with many to ensure if one station is taken out the others will still operate and of course for eficency.
Radiostations are placed in a circle formation with great distances betwen them, one could be in one location like north and another south of the country, any blocking of 1 single radiowave will prevent it from crossing it with the others, of course 1 plane can not block an entrire radar wave so they are built in a way so that they know the procentage of radio signal that failed to cross with the other waves and of course the location that the transmission lost it's intensity.
This tehnology is russian.
[edit on 29-5-2007 by pepsi78]
Originally posted by untilted
Originally posted by pepsi78
stelth can be beaten by advance sofisticated radars, 2 radiowaves from different directions are sent out on a intersect course, if the 2 radiowaves fail to intersect then the stealth plane is blocking them and stealth is detected.
Recently this has been done not with 2 radar stations but with many to ensure if one station is taken out the others will still operate and of course for eficency.
Radiostations are placed in a circle formation with great distances betwen them, one could be in one location like north and another south of the country, any blocking of 1 single radiowave will prevent it from crossing it with the others, of course 1 plane can not block an entrire radar wave so they are built in a way so that they know the procentage of radio signal that failed to cross with the other waves and of course the location that the transmission lost it's intensity.
This tehnology is russian.
[edit on 29-5-2007 by pepsi78]
there is an anti-stealth radar system called 'Tamara' developed in Czech Republic:
www.aeronautics.ru...
[edit on 31-5-2007 by untilted]
A Scottish newspaper is reporting that a spy within NATO's command structure informed Russia about the attack routes of U.S. stealth fighters during the bombing campaign against Yugoslavia, but senior U.S. officials told CNN the report is inaccurate.
The Scotsman, a daily newspaper published in Edinburgh, reports that an unidentified NATO officer leaked the flight routes and planned targets of F-117A stealth fighters to Moscow. The Russians then passed the information on to the Serbs, according to the report, on the condition that Belgrade allowed Russians to be present when the planes were attacked.
The article, written by defense analyst Paul Beaver, quotes NATO sources who said the officer was based in Brussels and had access to highly sensitive documents. The article says a NATO officer remains in custody.
However, a source on the staff of NATO's supreme commander for Europe, Wesley Clark, told CNN that while "we are aware that information was getting to the Serbs," there is "no information indicating that it was a spy or (coming from) anyone within NATO."
Originally posted by Zaphod58
They KNEW that someone was passing information on to the Russians and Serbs about attack orders, it was just a question of who and where, although at least one person said they had them in custody. Clark knew it was happening, just not who was doing it.
Originally posted by prevenge
reply to post by Figher Master FIN
how can one beat stealth? you can't BEAT the 'concept' of stealth...
,...absolute stealth would need ABSOLUTE technological/physics knowledge of all the uni/multiverse's physical laws... in order to go unobserved by ANY intelligence out there (any intelligence who wasn't ALSO holding all the absolute technological knowledge possible.)
but currently? as in being stealthy from other humans?
i'd think any tech that can sense mass displacement signatures in the environment could identify a craft that is using light or radar stealth... ie stealth fighter/bomber... and those cool LED cloaks that proect the video from the opposite side of the obect...
but to beat that you'd have to somehow phase out of our currently known 'reality' and into another here your mass is not interacting with our reality's mass index.
i've heard reports of UFO craft 'phasing' in and out of 'reality' .. or 'space-time' continuum'
but i really don't know what the hell i'm talking about. - just a wild guess...
but i suggest you broaden your concept of stealth past what you currently see in the military.. or MIT/DARPA development..
surely there are black ops projects decades beyond what you're allowed to know about.
edit on 1/24/2011 by prevenge because: (no reason given)