It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nygdan
But the invasion of three major muslim states in as many years might do that anyway. .
Why would iran really require more, let alone twice as much? The Revolutionary Guard isn't any better than the Republican Guard no? The region would be anarchic, but then again thats how a lot of large empires operated anyway..
Assuming that syria doesn't take the invasion of iran as a sign that their days are up. The possiblity of them launching a chemical weapons attack on the US while the Iran invasion is just getting underway might in and of itself warrant going to war with them at the get go..
Originally posted by American Mad Man
That is an interesting idea, but I don't buy it. The Syrian government has been playing "nicer" since the US invasion of Iraq.
Besides, if you are in a position of power in Syria, are you really going to commit suicide because Iran was attacked?
Syria and Iran would be the same by the time US ground forces reach the sites in question I doubt the means would still be available to steal oil.
Originally posted by Valorian
There is nothing more destroying than reading what has been said on this site, WAR, WAR and more WAR...
Try and start a thread that implies what it would do to have peace and how many individules (not armies) it would take to get PEACE on the table and NOT WAR
Simultaneous invasion of Iran and Syria possible?
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Russia helped out alot with Germany as a second front
but they didnt do squat with Japan. They declared war on Japan after the US dropped two atomic bombs on them
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
- Is that the ridiculous line they're pushing in US schools these days?
The truth is that Russia won WW2 in Europe.
Britain and her then Empire did a lot (and so too did the USA even if they were years late into it).
But to term it as "helped out a lot" is laughable and a grevious insult considering the price she paid.
- Sorry but this is plain wrong too.
Russia attacked the Japanese with approx 1.5 million (veteran) men along a vast 3000mile front on Aug 8th.
Their army and airforce were utterly superior to what the Japanese had (5500 of their excellent tanks, 3900 modern high performance aircraft and 25000 artillery guns and mortars) and simply overwhelmed them completely.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Russia won WW2 in Europe?
No see no single country won World War 2 in Europe.
Your just as wrong as people that say the US won WW2.
Thats a grevious insult to every person that died liberating Western Europe.
I dont know what lines they are feeding you in school.
Without the other allies and the second front Stalin kept asking the allies for Russia odds didnt look so good.
Aug 8th two days after Hiroshima LOL
Oh yes Russia declared war on Japan after it had all but lost the war and had a Atomic bomb dropped on them. What a great help to the Pacific Theater
utterly superior over a defeated country trying to figure out a way to surrender and keep their Emperor yeah I would hope so.
You got to be kidding with this stuff. Trying to make land grabs on a enemy defeated by others yeah sorry that is doing squat
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
- Basically yes, seeing as that was where the greatest part of it was really fought out.
- I did not say there was no-one else involved and I actually didn't down-play the contribution of the others either, unlike yourself.
- Very funny shadow.
You must watch your sides don't split one day with incredibly amusing comments like that.
- Coooo, impressive again, parroting back, wow.
- Dream on.
Russia was vast enough for them to lose the most enormous amounts of men and material initially and still come back with resouces Germany had not and could not even imagine.
Plus they had Germany riddled with spies telling them every move (even to the point of getting the actual German intel services to think it was feeding Russia proper - so as to be credible - intel about their strengths and deployments in the mistaken belief they were setting them up to one day turn the tables on them!)
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
No by saying Russia "won" WW2 in Europe you are infact down-playing the contribution of the others.
I never said a single one country won anything your the only one making such claims.
Yeah those comments were classics thats why they deserved to be rehashed. hmmm.. like chili better the second time.
Heres another one I think your Anti-US feeling are slipping out a tad
Now really whos the one whos dreaming. Phantom scenarios of Russia fighting in Europe without any second front. Thats a dream never happened and all this ^ is wild speculation on your part.
Perhaps you should read your own links on WW2. Its quite well known Stalin had been demanding that the Allies open-up a second front in Europe. ...Strange for this power that could win Europe by themselves.
The other allies werent asking Stalin to go to war with Japan and open a "second front" Hmmm.. interesting
The fact is Stalin waits to declare war on Japan until it has all but surrendered and had a Atomic bomb dropped on them.
WOW your right thats a huge help.
Originally posted by Vekar
web1.whs.osd.mil...
Where did you get YOUR statistics? Also its odd that China would have "only" 2.25 million troops but has 1/3 the world population and america only has some 290 million people and considering how many people DO NOT support the war..... hmmmmm odd that your numbers have a mysterious extra of 200,000+ people in it.