It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ghost
What's this about a SCRAMJET? SCRAMJETS (Supersonic Combustion Ramjets) are for speeds in excess of Mach 8! Are you maybe thinking of a Ramjet. It was a dule cycle turboramjet that gave the SR-71 Blackbird it's amazing speed.
Tim
Originally posted by intelgurl
However, regarding scramjets and at what speed their propulsion method can take hold, it is closer to the M3-M4 range, that is the point where the shockwave has enough strength to create an area of subsonic flow at the entrance to the combustor.
Originally posted by Nacnud
Originally posted by intelgurl
However, regarding scramjets and at what speed their propulsion method can take hold, it is closer to the M3-M4 range, that is the point where the shockwave has enough strength to create an area of subsonic flow at the entrance to the combustor.
I thought the whole point of a scramjet was that the flow was supersonic throughout the engine, hence the name - Supersonic Combustion RAM Jet.
Originally posted by intelgurl
The notion of an FB-23 concept with scramjet propulsion was put forth in a discussion regarding advanced technologies for the interim/regional bomber concept by planners of the program. Whether it was a real and viable suggestion I do not know.
However, regarding scramjets and at what speed their propulsion method can take hold, it is closer to the M3-M4 range, that is the point where the shockwave has enough strength to create an area of subsonic flow at the entrance to the combustor. From that point the scramjet could theoretically power a vehicle to speeds in excess of M15.
kilcoo316 is quite right, another propulsion system would be needed to get the scramjet powered vehicle to speeds that could kick off the scramjet - and yes that would be expensive but would it be prohibitively expensive? That's anybody's guess...
[edit on 12-14-2005 by intelgurl]
Originally posted by ghost
Mach 3 to Mach 4? No offence, but that speed sounds much too low! I have a video at home on the development of the A-12 and SR-71 Blackbird spyplanes. On the video, they have an interview with Kelly Johnson, in which he talk breifly about some of the technology that made the planes work. In the interview, Kelly said the Blackbird needed to get up to 1400 mph (Mach 2) before the engine would cycle into Ramjet mode.
If a normal RAM jet doesn't work untill it hits mach 2, how does a SCRAM jet work at Mach 3-4? Could you have confused Ramjets and Scramjets?
Can you please check that for me?
Tim
Originally posted by ghost
If a normal RAM jet doesn't work untill it hits mach 2, how does a SCRAM jet work at Mach 3-4? Could you have confused Ramjets and Scramjets?
Can you please check that for me?
Tim
"Therefore, If you have a dual propulsion aircraft, with both turbojet and scramjet, the turbojet would need to get the aircraft up to somewhere between M3 and M4 so that the scramjet can kick in - but in order for the scramjet to fire up at such "slow" speeds, it will need to be in the ramjet mode, which is to have the shockwave slowing the airflow into the engine to subsonic speeds. Then as the ramjet proceeds past M5 (approximately) the scramjet mode would take over. "
Originally posted by carcharodon
I don't understand one thing Intergul, if the scramjet is a dual purpose engine that can function at low and high speeds why did they have to attach a rocket to the X-43A in order to get it to hypersonic speeds where the scramjet could work.
Link to Dryden NASA
[edit on 15-12-2005 by carcharodon]
Originally posted by carcharodon
I don't understand one thing Intergul, if the scramjet is a dual purpose engine that can function at low and high speeds why did they have to attach a rocket to the X-43A in order to get it to hypersonic speeds where the scramjet could work.
[edit on 15-12-2005 by carcharodon]
Originally posted by ghost
A ScramJet is NOT a dual Purpose engine. It does not work bellow Mach 4 or 5. Remember, a scramjet is a type of ramjet. Ramjets do not have compressor to take in air, they use the shock wave from supersonic air entering the inlet to compress the air.
How a Ramjet works!
The above link will explane the physics behind Ramjets, and SCRAMJETS. Hopefully, this will answer your questions better then I can.
Tim
Originally posted by TristanBW9456
just wondering could I get a comparrison of the FB-23, FB-22, And X-44(tailless version of the FB-22)
Thank you
Originally posted by Harlequin
Integurl
why haven`t they refurbd any aadvarks yet? they are needed NOW!!