It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dbates
All the Republicans should be doing is sitting back and letting these Democratic leaders make outlandish statements,
Originally posted by centurion1211
Kerry gave aid and comfort to an enemy
On www.wintersoldier.com Timeline page, it says, "April 22, 1972 -- John Kerry represented the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) at the, "Emergency March for Peace", in Bryant Park in New York City." At that time, according to the FBI surveillance file, Section 50, Part 1, Page 152. Vietnam Veterans Against the War/Winter Soldier Organization (VVAW/WSO) revealed information about a US Military operation. " ....the VVAW/WSO operation during 04/72 during which a canvass of VVAW/WSO members, some in active military service, developed information indicating the US would bomb Hanoi and Haiphong and the VVAW/WSO disseminated this information prior to the actual bombing, seriously jeopardizing US Military operations and the lives of servicemen.
18 USC 953 - Private correspondence with foreign governments
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. . . ..
Marc Morano, CNSNews.com Thursday, May 20, 2004
The 1970 meeting that John F. Kerry conducted with North Vietnamese communists violated U.S. law, according to an author and researcher who has studied the issue. Kerry met with representatives from "both delegations" of the Vietnamese in Paris in 1970, according to Kerry's own testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 22, 1971. But Kerry's meetings with the communist Vietnamese delegations were in direct violation of laws forbidding private citizens from negotiating with foreign powers, according to researcher and author Jerry Corsi.
904. ART. 104. AIDING THE ENEMY
Any person who--
1) aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, or other things; or
(2) without proper authority, knowingly harbors or [protects or gives intelligence to or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly;
shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct.
18 USC 953
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Originally posted by kenshiro2012
His meeting with NVA would be in violation of the UCMJ and falls under the heading of aiding the enemy.
Originally posted by Seekerof
or that of his current interpreted actual or implied saying that the US troops in Iraq/Afghanistan were 'terrorists').
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
We're seeing the statement being modified through political sensationalism in an obvious effort to deflect the issue from something important to confusing minutiae that has nothing to do with the initial issue.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I cannot put Bush and Kerry in the same group. Bush is an idiot.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Sensationalism in respects to Kerry:
Mr. Kerry's use of sensationalist-type wording or language (ie/example: "baby killers", murderers, 'terrorists', etc.) will undoubtedly incur sensationalist-type interpretations and mentionings (ie/example: Kerry "unquestionably" said or implied that the US troops in Vietnam were 'baby killers', murderers, etc., or that of his current interpreted actual or implied saying that the US troops in Iraq/Afghanistan were 'terrorists').
Originally posted by Seekerof
Unfortunately, as I have mentioned within this topic and as you already know and have indicated in the past, political sensationalism is a tool utilized by all political sides. This topic is but one more example.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
You're BUYING the sensationalism. But that's your choice, of course.
Originally posted by Seekerof
and for you to sit there and think that you do not do likewise is ludicrous. .
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
What did Dean say that was "outlandish" in this example? This is what I'm not grokking.
Originally stated by Howard Dean
(Listen to entire interview)
"The idea that the United States is going to win the war in Iraq is just plain wrong."
Originally posted by Seekerof
In relation to this topic, the media's use of political sensationalism is serving both sides of this pulpit effectively, would you differ?
Originally posted by Seekerof
My agenda, which is quite different from *your* agenda, serves my purposes well. Does yours?
In relation to this topic, the media's use of political sensationalism is serving both sides of this pulpit effectively, would you differ?