It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Flinx
I thought the "birds as descendants of dinosaurs" theory was already widely accepted. I mean you can just look at certain dinos and see the uncanny resemblance. I remember reading a while ago that even the T-Rex might have had feathers.
[edit on 12/5/2005 by Flinx]
Originally posted by Jakomo
Another nail in the coffin of the Intelligent Design/Creationism theory.
E-v-o-l-u-t-i-o-n, baby!
Originally posted by djohnsto77
There is a slight problem with the link, here's a working one:
Fossil discovery supports theory that birds are living dinosaurs
Originally posted by rich34
Not only that, but how do you explain fossilized trees that somehow are intact yet go through layers of earth that are considered 50,000, 1 million, 10 million and 50 million years old by archeologist? Are the trees that old?
originally posted by the all-knowing ever-wise Rren
It appears that this widely accepted theory now has some critics outside of the Creationist community. I am no expert, to say the least, but it seems to me that this team raises some valid questions and presents solid evidence that directly contradicts current theory. It's also important to note that the current theory has no evidence "either structural or biological" and the timeline directly contradicts known evidence of Archaeopteryx, which was already a bird, that predates the fossils with the so called "protofeathers" by some 25-80 million years.
Originally posted by Jakomo
Another nail in the coffin of the Intelligent Design/Creationism theory.
E-v-o-l-u-t-i-o-n, baby!