It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Three small Sunni parties formed a coalition list on Wednesday. The Iraqi Islamic Party, the National Dialogue Council and the People's Gathering will join forces to contest the December 15 elections.
Before anyone gets too excited about this development, it should be noted that Reuters goes on to report,
' "Our political program will focus more on getting the Americans out of Iraq," Hussein al-Falluji, a prominent Sunni who took part in talks on the constitution, told Reuters. "Our message to the American administration is clear: get out of Iraq or set a timetable for withdrawal or the resistance will keep slaughtering your soldiers until Judgment Day." '
continued...
"Our message to the American administration is clear: get out of Iraq or set a timetable for withdrawal or the resistance will keep slaughtering your soldiers until Judgment Day." '
Originally posted by ArchAngel
Three small Sunni parties formed a coalition list on Wednesday. The Iraqi Islamic Party, the National Dialogue Council and the People's Gathering will join forces to contest the December 15 elections.
Before anyone gets too excited about this development, it should be noted that Reuters goes on to report,
' "Our political program will focus more on getting the Americans out of Iraq," Hussein al-Falluji, a prominent Sunni who took part in talks on the constitution, told Reuters. "Our message to the American administration is clear: get out of Iraq or set a timetable for withdrawal or the resistance will keep slaughtering your soldiers until Judgment Day." '
continued...
Its nice to see them orgainzing politically to promote what the majority of the Iraqi people want.
One way, or another we will force them to work together.
Whether its with us, or against us is up to us.
As long as we are digging in, and killing civilians the prospects of a Pro-US Iraq dwindle.
Suprisingly, they don't mention the British getting out. Is this because they already envisage a split Iraq?
Originally posted by jsobecky
I may be wrong, but I thought the Brits already announced plans to withdraw. It happened some time last summer, I think.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Did you not see this:
"Our message to the American administration is clear: get out of Iraq or set a timetable for withdrawal or the resistance will keep slaughtering your soldiers until Judgment Day." '
The sunnis are the resistance.
They are 20% of the population. Their views do not reflect the majority of Iraqis.
Alll they are saying is, give us what we want or the bloodshed will continue. And that means innocent Iraqi blood as well as American blood.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
Why is it so hard for people like you to understand that nobody wants foreign forces in their nation, and that the honeymoon is long over.
Because if the majority of some 26 million people really wanted the Coalition out they would be. There is no way 114,000 or whatever troops could occupy that many with easy access to weapons if they truley wanted the Coalition out.
These so called "Freedom fighters" tend to kill more Iraqies then they do US troops in attacks.
Does it say what area that poll was taken? Sunni, Shiite, Ex-Bath party etc.. dominated locations? Does it say how the questions were worded?
If I took polls in the right places in Germany after WW2 I could get the same results. If I went to other areas in Germany I could get results saying the opposite. If I change how the poll asked the questions I could also influence the results.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
I think the analogy fits poorly.
More closely representing the situation would be "If I took polls in the right places in France after the Nazi invasion......"
[edit on 28-10-2005 by ArchAngel]
Originally posted by Leveller
Originally posted by jsobecky
I may be wrong, but I thought the Brits already announced plans to withdraw. It happened some time last summer, I think.
Nope. The UK government has suggested it might be able to scale down numbers by a few hundred, but it has stated as recently as last week that it has no intention of pulling out of Iraq until the Iraqi government asks it to.
So comparing a past US Occupation with a insurgency is a bad analogy for a Current one?
Originally posted by ArchAngel
Are you saying that you've seen a poll where the majority of Iraqis want us to stay indefinitely?
US troops tend to kill far more innocent Iraqis than terrorists......
Originally posted by ArchAngel
Saddam was nowhere near Hitler in any comparison, but Bush is on the path that could pale Hitler.