It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ANOK
Who gives a damn about DWI, nobody is forced to drink and drive.
Originally posted by ANOK
Were you there putting your life on the line?
Those of us that did will be paying for that for the rest of our lives.
Where is this support you all claim to be giving now?
Originally posted by ANOK
And back to your DUI analogy. If Cindy Sheehan was the mother of a guy who was killed by a drunk driver instead of in an illegal war, would you still be against her?
Originally posted by devilwasp
A) You said yourself your an ex-serviceman but could you explain to me how we would "get them back"?
Whats the exit strategy? I mean does the US go crying to the UN for help? Do we let iraq descend into chaos and civil war?
Do we help them?
B) I think the comparision about the drink driving is quite the same, what about all the deaths that have happened in my country and yours due to drink driving, assualts, gang wars, etc. When you look at the results you start to wonder, wheres the real battlefield? Iraq or at home?
C) 2000 men and women dead from america is..well theres no real word for it..but you have to ask yourself, or more precisely ask those that did make it out. Was it worth it? Did THEY think it was "the right thing to do"?
D) You made a comment earlier about "armchair" generals, I wanted to ask something. I support the war and frankly I have to ask, what do you want me to do?Go fight in the war?Stay at home?Finish my cadetship? Become a full comunist? What do you want me to do?
Originally posted by ANOK
Sry to answer your questions with more questions but...
Do you think we should help them?
How are we helping them?
Look at Iraq now, is it any better than it was?
Do they really want our help?
War to me is not helping anybody.
I say pull the troops out, let them deal with their own problems, we have enough of our own we can't take care of as you have pointed out.
What would happen if the U.N. decided the U.S. population needed to be liberated from Bush? Would you support that?
Deaths caused by alcohol and gangs here in the U.S. does not justify the death of people in an illegal war in a country thousands of miles away.
If we didn't go running around making war with other countries for agendas having nothing to do with freedom or democracy we could maybe take care of those problems that are on our own doorstep.
What did the Bible say about logs in thine eyes?
[/qoute]
No offence to anyone who believes in god, but IMO the bibles not to be trusted.
What have those deaths done for us?
What does any death do?
Its not about the deaths IMO , but what they fought to do.
And what about the 10,000 dead from Gulf War related illneses and wounds?
What about the ones created in this war?
Or the illnesses at home?
I've yet to see any of you tackle that one.
I didnt know if it was "taboo" ornot I'm afriad..
What's up? That number too big for you all to comprehend. 2000 dead is far from the real truth now isn't it?
2000 dead isnt to far for the real truth for me, you want the truth?
I believe the only year a british serviceman wasnt killed was 1986.....thats right 1986 was the last time no british servicemen died.
That hits me hard.
What about those Gulf War vets who are sick and can't work. Guess what?
What about any vets who get sick and cant work?
You're paying for them now with SSI and service connected disability payments. You see the cost of this war for us all is far more than 2000 dead U.S. servicemen.
2000 dead servicemen is far more costy to me than paying with social security (BTW I am not old enough to pay that)
I can't tell you what to do, that's up to you to decide.
Yes it is up to me to decide but look at the posts in this thread and others, "Why do you support murderers!" or "Are you being unpatriotic?" Or "Your a coward! Go out and fight!" . All these voices, all these people telling you diffrent things and thier opinions on everything and anything.
The one serios question is this; Why are you telling me what to do? Why me?
All I ask is for you to really think about what you mean by "support the troops".
I support just about every troop I can, my cousin in law to be is now a serving marine in the RMC's.
Those that are now sick because of it are getting very little support. Do you know how hard it is for vets to get disabilitity payments? I've been sick for 6 yrs, haven't been able to work in 4 yrs. I just got on SSI 2 yrs ago, still waiting for service connected. Where is the support for the troops now. And this is nothing new, look up agent orange. Veitnam vets were screwed over the same way.
Back here I am sure we treat our wounded servicemen quite well.
Hell, if they cant work I think the MOD continues to pay them.
I support the wounded vets and seving troops, just because your wounded, cant work or even just in pain you should be respected.
Wave the flag for us while we're on the battle front but when we get home we're just another casualty to be forgotten about and kept quite by the government who don't want thier dirty laundry waving in everyones faces.
Means you might actualy have to do more than just wave a flag. Rah rah rah!!
I am sorry if thats how your treated and thats how you feel , I truly am.
I'm sorry if your government treats you like that, I'm not too sure mine does but I sure as hell hope it doesnt!
What do you mean by "support"...
I stand behind them in just about everything, if they ask for help I'll give it. Hell I want to be one when I'm older.
dictionary.reference.com...
please explain what from that list of meanings you are doing??
Well atleast in that I am;
To argue in favor of
Wouldn't bringing the troops home and taking care of our own many, many problems be more supportive than just flag waving?
Yes it would, but would it solve the problem we are in?
Would it make what those men and women died or where wounded for just superfluous?
What is it about this war you feel justifies all that expanse in lives and money?
What is it that justifies a war? Nothing, except self defence. Only the outcome can make those who got hurt and wounded in it worthwhile.
10,000+ dead and thousands sick, is that worth it to you? Whatever it is.
Was it worht 10,000 dead and thousands sick to remove a regime that slaughtered, mutilated, raped and commited varios other horrible acts on its own people worth it?
Was it worth sending my countries armed forces to war to try and correct a mistake we made before? Yes. I think it was.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by skippytjc
That’s just it Biker, we all want to feel sorry for her loss. But she has ruined it.
Speak for yourself. There are as many people (if not more) who respect her and think she's great for what she's doing.
By the way, bikereddie, she has always been against the war. It was only after Casey died in April that she AND HER HUSBAND founded Gold Star Families for Peace and she became more active. It was only in August of this year when she went to Bush's ranch in Crawford that people began to know who she is.
What would happen if the U.N. decided the U.S. population needed to be liberated from Bush? Would you support that?
Originally posted by Bikereddie
That is the question i need answering. Did she campaign before? If not, then why not. If she has such notions now, where were they before her son died?
Originally posted by dbates
I don't mind people criticizing the President and his administration, I just get tired of the stories that focus on the troops in a negative way. Ooooh they burned a couple of corpses they found. Those bad soldiers. O no! A soldier shot a camera man (Who point a large shoulder mounted object at a tank in the middle of a war-zone). That's the kind of stuff I get so sick of hearing.
Originally posted by ANOK
Devilwasp I'm not gonna answer yourb whole post because if you read my posts corectly I already have, you seem very confused about where I'm coming from.
I was in the U.S. military, I am talking about the U.S. military, and the U.S. government. Got it now?
Get a clue. There are thousands of us U.S. troops sick and dying, not from wounds, but from vacines that we were given as guinea pigs, from depleted uraniam rounds and other things. Infact over 10,000 have died sinse Gulf one.
You obviously are not reading my posts corectly, only seeing what you want to, otherwise you would already know that, right?
What did you say the gov is doing for our vets? You don't have a clue do you? C'mon be honest now, as I am being with you. I know first hand what they are doing. Same thing they did with the vietnam vets and agent orange. Denying everything as usual!
Have you ever tried living on disability payments? Got a car? Well that's gotta go, can't afford it. Want to live in a house? No way dude can't afford it.
Want to get married have kids? Oh no can't do that can't afford AND if I have kids they will have Gulf War illness, betcha didn't know that did you? Yes babies of vets are being born with GWI and other physical problems. You see this goes far deeper than your press and it's 2000 dead troops!
Think about that for awhile. Still think it's worth it?
Hell, if they cant work I think the MOD continues to pay them.
Originally posted by ANOK
War is agressive, vets are agressive, we were taught to be. You don't stop when they let you out. This situation needs agression or nothing will change.
[edit on 27/10/2005 by ANOK]
Originally posted by ANOK
OK, DOH!! My bad Devilwasp, I apolagize
I am English myself born and draged up, but was in U.S. military (long story) and I was assuming wrongly you thought I was talking about the Brits military cause I mentioned I'm English earlier somewhere.
Most ppl on this site I'm sure you know are American.
Was getting a little heated and carried away in this thread. It's a subject VERY close to my heart as I'm sure you understand.
That was the reason for what you called agression. Just trying to point out why getting payed by the MOD or whoever (or not in MOST cases) doesn't solve the vets problems. It's barely enough to live on. We want to be able to work, to contribute like anyone else. But when our "duty" is done we're thrown an old chewed bone and expect to be happy with it.
Sry if you thought I was being too agressive but it seems in this thread that was the only way to make a point. War is agressive, vets are agressive, we were taught to be. You don't stop when they let you out. This situation needs agression or nothing will change.
[edit on 27/10/2005 by ANOK]
Originally posted by deltaboy
www.washingtonpost.com...
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Cindy Sheehan, the military mother who made her son's death in Iraq a rallying point for the anti-war movement, plans to tie herself to the White House fence to protest the milestone of 2,000 U.S. military deaths in Iraq.
hmm.. i could swear Obama promised during or before his 1st term, that he would bring all our troops home specifically from Afghanistan...
which makes the following news impossible. how did that happen?
edit on 14-12-2012 by minnow because: (no reason given)