Cindy Sheenan takes on Hillary, calls her a warhawk.

wnd.com...

Cindy Sheehan, the so-called "peace mom" on a crusade to end U.S. involvement in the Iraq war, is publicly blasting Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., for her continued support of the ongoing conflict.

"I think she is a political animal who believes she has to be a war hawk to keep up with the big boys," Sheehan writes in an open letter posted on anti-Bush filmmaker Michael Moore's website. "I would love to support Hillary for president if she would come out against the travesty in Iraq. But I don't think she can speak out against the occupation, because she supports it. I will not make the mistake of supporting another pro-war Democrat for president again: As I won't support a pro-war Republican."

"I believe that the intelligent thing for Democrats to do for 2006 and 2008 would be to come out strongly and correctly against the botched, bungled, illegal, and immoral occupation of Iraq," Sheehan added.

calling Hillary a warhawk or just critcizing Hillary for not doin anithing about pulling troops out? it seems to me shes losing it big time.

Hillary and Lieberman are warhawks. Liberals can't stand them.

Sad thing is I see the Republicans looking at crippling stagflation coming and throwing the election to Hillary just so they don't have to deal with the mess they made. Just like Iraq.

Jerks.

Kind of like what happened after Kennedy got shot by the CIA? The VP becomes President and gets stuck with all of Kennedy's problems, the Russians, Vietnam, so forth. Except this time the republicans are just hoping to let Hillary win and take the blame for all of Bush's screwups...

"Well the reason the economy is so bad is because of the democrats!"

What do you mean? Hillary has tripled it since she won office, sure it is still bad, but what's triple of .02%? She has to work with what the republicans screwed up.

"Evil Liberal! Worship Bush!"

First of all any candidate that will even think to run for the white house presidential seat Has to agree with Iraq Why?

Very simple, Bush put US in Iraq, our troops are dying in Iraq, and is not about the conflict in Iraq but the support of our troops.

That is why they have to support the conflict in Iraq.

That may have been true a year ago, I don't think it's true any longer.
More and more people see the Iraq war as simply a huge waste of lives and money.

Frankly, if it went up for a referendum today, we'd be pulling out tomorrow.