It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nygdan
They picked it up probably from the the etruscans (who are supposed to be descended from the lydians in what is now turkey)
Originally posted by Lexicon
Originally posted by Nygdan
They picked it up probably from the the etruscans (who are supposed to be descended from the lydians in what is now turkey)
The supposed descent of the Etruscans from the Lydians is fairly unlikely. The claim comes from Herodotus, who says the Tyrrhenians came from Lydia, and some believe that the Tyrrhenians were the Etruscans. However, there's no evidence to connect the Tyrrhenians with the Etruscans.
Originally posted by Nygdan
I've never heard this argument before. Certainly would be interesting. Who are the tyrrhenians supposed to be then if not the etruscans?
Regardless of this identity with the tyrrhenians, there is at lemnos an artifact with etruscan like writting on it that is variably thought to be a remnant of an eastern population or a projection of the etruscans into there.
A very interesting development tho is that genetic tests were done on etruscan remains, and they 'match' populations in western turkey.
The researchers obtained mitochondrial DNA sequences from 80 Etruscans
who lived between the seventh and third centuries BC, and whose
skeletons are preserved in museum and public collections. They
excluded samples that might have been significantly degraded or
contaminated with modern DNA.
When the sequences of individual Etruscans buried in different regions
were compared, they showed relatively little genetic variation. This
suggests that the Etruscans were a single population descended from
common ancestors, rather than a collection of genetically different
groups who shared a common culture.
When compared with sequences of modern-day Europeans, the Etruscans
appear most closely related to populations on the southern and eastern
Mediterranean shores. The best matches are with sequences from Tuscany
and Turkey, hinting that the Etruscans evolved from local populations
and that there was some interbreeding with populations in Asia Minor,
which fits historical trading records. Nonetheless, few of the
Etruscan sequences exactly match modern ones — signifying, perhaps,
that the population rapidly died out after being swallowed by the
Roman Empire.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Interesting no?
Mussolini adopted it as the rather natural symbol of his party, because of its classical connotations, and also because, apparently, an italian word for 'peasant' or 'worker in the field' sounds like fasces, and the national-socializing partys appealed to the working class.
Originally posted by Lexicon
does that not perhaps mean that various scattered Mediterranean non-Indo-European peoples were related further back?
Originally posted by frayed1
Mussolini adopted it as the rather natural symbol of his party, because of its classical connotations, and also because, apparently, an italian word for 'peasant' or 'worker in the field' sounds like fasces, and the national-socializing partys appealed to the working class.
Interesting.....My Dad was in Italy during WWII, he said that the Italians would ask the soldiers for American coins, but when given a dime, they would spit on it and throw it on the ground. When asked why, they would show them this very symbol and say what sounded, to him, like "facists"......