It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by resistance
What a big crock!
[edit on 7-10-2005 by resistance]
Originally posted by ShakyaHeir
Originally posted by resistance
What a big crock!
[edit on 7-10-2005 by resistance]
Yeah, and beleiving that the earth was created 6000 years ago with the garden of eden and that dinosaurs lived with Adam and Eve is not a crock.
Right...
Originally posted by resistance
No, I DON'T think it's a crock. Why should I?...
We have wild animals today that are man-eaters -- lots of them. That does not prevent life from going on. Florida thinks big hungry vicious reptiles are "cute" and have laws against killing them. I think that's weirder than the idea that dinosaurs could have coexisted with humans.
Well, in the Garden of Eden there were no meat-eaters at all, and all the animals were gentle. After the fall, God cursed the earth and cast Adam and Eve out of the Garden...
Originally posted by The Surrealist
Actually the Earth felt its end on 16 July 1776.
Originally posted by SportyMB
so perhaps another contributor can explain what, if any, is the significance of this document in regards to any change in stance from the church official hierarchy.
Hmm, Im no expert either...but I think I have an axample of what they mean. I think according to the bible, the Earth/Man is only 6,000 years old....but obviously we're much older than that and the Church knows this...so they're sending this document to let people know that some things in the Bible are not at face value...or something like that.
Im all confused now
Rev 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
Rev 17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
Rev 20:3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.
Rev 17:5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
Originally posted by NuTroll
Im personally appalled by the Catholics lack of faith.
after all, how can you not believe the bible but still
use it as justification for anti birth control
Originally posted by Nygdan
I've never understood this argument, sex for any purpose other than procreation is a sin in the church, a pious and obedient catholic would break that rule, commit that great sin, but not use a condom? They'd be ok with breaking the rules about having sex, but not about using contraception? Perhaps its less of an issue with respect to married couples tho.
I've never understood this arguement. Premarita
Originally posted by resistance
They have always said their tradition and the pronouncements
of the pope trump their "bible."
The former pope issued a decree endorsing evolution.
The Catholic church through the ages has kept the bible
locked away, not wanting the commoner to have a peek at it.
The Catholic church is thought by many to be the whore of
Babylon spoken of in Revelation, the beast who sits upon the seven hills.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I think you must reside on the moon, if you don't understand the importance of this document. The literal interpretation of the Bible ruled Western Civilization for millenia, impeded the advance of science, and is at the heart of school curricula debates throughout the land. How many heretics were burned at the stake, literally and figuratively, for believing that the earth is round or that the earth was not the center of the universe? This doesn't really come as a surprise, since the church some while back issued an apology to Galileo.
www.beliefnet.com...
Originally posted by resistance
They have always said their tradition and the pronouncements
of the pope trump their "bible."
by Flyersfan
Uh ... nope. The Catholic faith is based on scripture and sacred
tradition. Sacred traditions that have been passed down for
two thousand years. Scripture does NOT hold all of God's truth.
Scripture says so. It also says to hold onto holy truths and traditions.
This is what the Catholic church does.
The former pope issued a decree endorsing evolution.
by Flyersfan:
He said that it is okay to believe that evolution happened, as
long as you believe that God was the author of it... that God
used evolution to form man and that at some point he had
Adam and Eve. He said you don't have to believe in Evolution
but if you do, it's okay as long as you believe God was the
author.
Uh .. no. The bible was available for everyone to read. It was in
LATIN and the common folk were not educated enough to read.
The bible was available for any university student.
by Shaky:
You seem the type that would literally interpret the bible. Well try and wrap your head around this: If God created everything and is omnipotent (all powerful) and omniscient (all knowing -this includes knowing the future and past) then God is the one that created evil. How you might ask? By not stopping his creation, Satan, from bringing evil upon the world (actually in the case of an all powerful and all knowing God, the actions of Satan were pre-ordained by God before he even created him). God might as well have created evil himself instead of sublimating it to Satan. If God is really 100% good, with no evil at all then he would not have been able to create evil, or create something with the capacity for evil. If God created evil then he is, at least in part, evil. No matter how you cut it, there's no way around this conundrum. Actually wait, let me rephrase that, there's no logical way around this conundrum.
And what kind of God would create people as imperfect beings and then condemn them to hell for all eternity for not accepting Jesus (what about the people who live and die without ever hearing about Jesus? what about the souls of animals?) as their lord and savior? A really sadistic one.
If God created everything and is omnipotent (all powerful) and omniscient (all knowing -this includes knowing the future and past) then God is the one that created evil.
Originally posted by resistance
Shaky, here's the thing that Calvinists just can't understand about God. They think if God knows what's going to happen that means God made it happen, that that's the only way God could know what's going to happen.
...There are many psychics who have glimpses into the future. They are not causing the future to happen. It's just that they are able to see ahead to what will be happening as though it had already happened.
You see, it's a matter of time, not control. God is outside of time, and God is the creator of time. So God can step outside of time and look at the big picture. But just because God sees it happening does not mean God is making it happen or even that God could change anything from happening that he saw. Why? Because if he changed it, it would not be, and therefore how could he see it?
Scripture says that even if an angel of light should appear and tell you somehting contrary to the scripture, you are to reject it.
The Calvinists hate God and tell lies about him which causes people to turn away from God, to withdraw their faith in Him. Kinda like the parable of the sower, how the first example shows the birds coming along and eating the seeds before they have a chance to sprout. Satan is a liar, and he will steal whatever little faith you have if you listen to His lies. Instead, soften up your heart a bit so the Word of God can take root. Don't let Satan steal your faith with his lies.
Originally posted by ShakyaHeir
resistance, you are completely ignoring the logic behind everything I've said. Though, that's not to say that I didn't expect you to.
Originally posted by resistance
Shaky, here's the thing that Calvinists just can't understand about God. They think if God knows what's going to happen that means God made it happen, that that's the only way God could know what's going to happen.
Shaky:
No, I preceded that statement with an important qualifier, that if God is omniscient and omnipotent. If he is not both of these things then he is not responsible for evil, but if he is then there's no way around the fact that he is responsible. If he know's what's going to happen, but he didn't make it happen or he cant stop it from happening that means that he's omniscient but not omnipotent. If he does have the power to stop it from happening but does not then that means that he chooses to let it happen.
...There are many psychics who have glimpses into the future. They are not causing the future to happen. It's just that they are able to see ahead to what will be happening as though it had already happened.
Shaky:
None of those psychics are all powerful, if they were, then seeing the future and not doing anything to change it (because you have the ability to do anything and cause anything to happen if you're omnipotent) would make them responsible (at least partially if not fully) for what happened because of their lack of action.
Let's look at it this through an example. Say you're a psychic and you live next to some train tracks. You have a vision one night where you see a baby being tied to the train tracks and left there for six hours, finally after the six hour pass a train comes and runs the baby over, flattening it like a pancake. You know for a fact this event will come to pass in a week. A week goes by and you look out your window to see a mysterious figure leaving the tracks behind your house and a wriggling bundle tied to the tracks. The baby is tied to the tracks with normal rope and you have plenty of wire cutters and heavy duty scissors in your toolbox. You know that there will be six hours that go by before the train comes and actually runs over the baby.
If you do not take your wire cutters, cut the rope, and rescue the baby then aren't you at least partially responsible for letting it die? In this example I didn't even make the psychic all powerful, but I put the event within his or her power to change. If we want to look at this scenario through your view of time, then the baby will die regardless of whether anyone knows it will happen or not because it's an event that has been preordained. And the psychic (who can be likened to God surveying time) is powerless to change anything (therefore making God in this example not omnipotent).
Resistance: You see, it's a matter of time, not control. God is outside of time, and God is the creator of time. So God can step outside of time and look at the big picture. But just because God sees it happening does not mean God is making it happen or even that God could change anything from happening that he saw. Why? Because if he changed it, it would not be, and therefore how could he see it?
Shaky:
So you are saying that time is unchangeable? If so that means that we have no free will because all our actions are predetermined. If we do have free will on the other hand, then nothing in time is decided until we actually make that decision and therefore God could not see it happening.
You also assert that God is the creator of time, and that he can step outside of time and look at "the big picture" (which I'm assuming you're referring to all the events that happen in your predetermined view of time). This means that when he created the universe he also preordained all events in history by creating (your version of) time, essentially deciding what would happen and when. If God lacks the ability to change things in the time stream then he is not all powerful. And if there are creatures with free will in God's creation that also means that he is not all powerful (and it also means that events cannot be preordained).
You say it's a matter of time and not control. I say it's a matter of both. If God created everything out of nothing and if God created time that means that he at least had control of it when he created it. If after words he can't change something he created then he is no longer (which calls to question whether he ever was in the first place) omnipotent. And once again, if God can step back and look at "the big picture" then no one has any free will (including God according to you) because no matter what you do things will still turn out to be the same, meaning that all the people that go to hell were specifically created by God for that very purpose, being tortured for all eternity. Also if we look at the logical consequences of what you're asserting then Time>God.
I don't hate God at all. I have a strong faith in God. But unlike you I don't believe that "Satan" whispers in my ear, lies to me, and causes me to sin.
Originally posted by resistance
Yes? And if he chooses to let it happen that means he's responsible for it? I don't see that.
You're saying that God should have wiped out the entire earth at the flood and just wiped out Satan and his rebelling angels and just went with the good angels he had in Heaven?
...and it's obvious God does not sit back and do nothing. He's always intervening in the affairs of men. But he doesn't always, and not everything that happens on this earth is God's will, and it's certainly not all micromanaged by God...
We have free will. God knows what we're going to do, but they're not done until we do them, and if we don't do them God won't see them being done.
I don't get what you're saying here.
You can't make something not happen that's already happened. That is a feature of the phenomenon known as "time."
God created beings and gave them free will. Over time these persons of their own free will did the things they chose to do.
God does not turn into a weakling because he doesn't decide to obliterate time and all the people and all the deeds that would have occurred during that time.
Well, you cause yourself to sin, and you're the one who chooses to believe Satan's lies. The Bible says Satan is a liar, that he's here to kill and destroy, and that he prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour. So where do you think you are getting these ideas about God micromanaging everything and being to blame for all the evil in the world? Who else but Satan would say such an evil thing against God?
Originally posted by resistance
I'd be running away from God too if I thought he was the way you describe him.
And the Buddhist/Hindu religion is atheist, said to be atheist by the courts.
So why are you posting on this thread about the Catholic church if you don't give a rip for Christianity anyway?