It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeaceWarning Will Robinson! Media Spin Detected!
Watch as the British press starts putting the spin on the whole Basra state of affairs, doing their job helping Washington to demonize Iran. Until recently the 'foreign insurgents' were all coming out of Syria. Now they're suddenly all from or supported by Iran and Hezbollah.
Originally posted by skippytjc
Not my news source Nygdan, dont look at me. But why not humor it as truth?
Iran has a documented history of this sort of thing...
NK
who are you to say which country should or should not make their own choices even when coming to nuke issues.
well i havent signed out of NPT yet
your saying we cant have our own and cant even make 1? please
Originally posted by Dronetek
I think we can all agree if that happens, WWIII is very probable.
[edit on 5-10-2005 by Dronetek]
Originally posted by AgentSmith
Isn't it possible that it might actually be true though? If it's that easy to accept that it's all lies is it not possible it might be true? Might there not be new information? People change their minds on subjects frequantly when presented with new information, and rightly so othewise it would show narrow-mndedness.
People change their minds on subjects frequantly when presented with new information, and rightly so othewise it would show narrow-mndedness.
Oh and it's "Danger, Will Robinson!" not 'Warning, Will Robinson'.
'Warning!, Warning!' was another of Robot's catchphrases..
Originally posted by AgentSmith
EDIT -
Apologies, I was thinking of Israel - I said I wasn't an expert!
I can't think of anything specific I've heard about Iran, prior to some of these new stories in the news.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Nygdan
Its not the US, its the world that is saying Iran can't have nukes, and the very treaty that the Iranian government signed in order to be given nuke tech expressly demands that it be for peaceful purposes. You, as in Iran, have no right to build nuke weapons now, you gave up that right in order to be openly and honestly given the nuclear technology.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
People change their minds on subjects frequantly when presented with new information, and rightly so othewise it would show narrow-mndedness.
Oh and it's "Danger, Will Robinson!" not 'Warning, Will Robinson'.
'Warning!, Warning!' was another of Robot's catchphrases..
And "frequently" is spelt with two 'e's and no 'a', but what's your point exactly? Or were you just nitpicking on something that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic?
[edit on 2005-10-5 by wecomeinpeace]
Originally posted by rogue1
Anyone who doesn't think Iran has its fingers in the Iraqi pie are being extremely naive. The Iranians want nothing more than to see a shiite religious governemnt controlling Iraq.
If anyone disagrees just read a little of the history between the 2 countries.
Originally posted by AgentSmith
The phrase you used was nothing to do with the topic either, however I just thought I was having a joke with another Lost in Space fan - obviously not. Sorry.
Luxifero wrote:
There has been no definite evidence that Iran has ebetted these insurgents, so why the British make these spurious claims is obvious.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
Originally posted by AgentSmith
The phrase you used was nothing to do with the topic either, however I just thought I was having a joke with another Lost in Space fan - obviously not. Sorry.
Sorry mate, but your comment came across as being a smart-arse, and if it wasn't intended that way then I apologise for my reaction. Chalk it up to the 'tone interpretation' problem inherent with typed communication.
Originally posted by Luxifero
The veracity of these claims is highly suspect. There has been no definite evidence that Iran has ebetted these insurgents, so why the British make these spurious claims is obvious; to render public opinion on Iran and continue to make sure war with Iran is inevitable.
Luxifero
Originally posted by skippytjc
Hold up people, Iran was the place that should have been invaded from the very start of all this mess, not Iraq. Dont let the situation in Iraq cloud our views of Iran. They have always been a threat to the west and they dont even attempt to hide it.
Not everything is a cover up, a conspiracy or spin. Sometimes things are just as they sound.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
Originally posted by devilwasp
Well withrespect NR you signed the NPT, you want to break it, your choice; just expect concequesnces.
Where has Iran broken the NPT?
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
If they try to aquire or make a nulcear weapon while still a member they would have broke the NPT.
Originally posted by Dronetek
Iran 'behind attacks on British'
Imagine the surprise, then, of Jack Straw and his officials the following morning when they opened their newspapers to discover that the future constitutional arrangements for Iraq had been completely superseded by official British confirmation that Iran's Revolutionary Guards were behind the deadly attacks that have recently claimed the lives of eight British soldiers.
For the past two years it has been a Foreign Office mantra that not a word should be uttered that could in any way be construed as criticising the Iranian government. Having voiced his last-minute opposition to the invasion of Iraq, Mr Straw had taken it upon himself to find a "negotiated solution" to the West's stand-off with Teheran over its clandestine nuclear programme as an alternative to military confrontation.
Indeed, when The Sunday Telegraph two weeks ago revealed that agents working for the Revolutionary Guards had linked up with the Iraqi groups responsible for the attacks on British troops, the Foreign Office continued to insist that there was no firm evidence.
But now the cat is out of the bag. Not realising the sensitivity that Mr Straw attaches to Britain's dealings with Teheran, the unfortunate diplomat unwittingly strayed from his referendum brief and started laying into the Iranians with a gusto not seen in the British diplomatic service for decades. The Iranians, said the diplomat, were colluding with Sunni Muslim insurgent groups in southern Iraq. They were providing them with deadly terrorist technology that has been perfected by the Iranian-funded Hizbollah militia in southern Lebanon against the Israeli army. And their motivation was to deter Britain from insisting that Teheran abandon its controversial nuclear programme. "It would be entirely natural that they would want to send a message 'don't mess with us'. It would not be outside the policy parameters of Teheran."