It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
resistance
And Hubble's pics are virtual relality. It's more of a computer than it is a telescope. It can't even get us a good picture of the moon
It's a fallacy that the bigger the telescope the farther out in space you can see.
You can't see what isn't there.
Originally posted by Frosty
I can't believe Micheal Griffin has made it this easy for some of you to buy into Bush's political goal. This is propoganda people, such as it was the first time. Let's get to the moon first before the commies do. That's what this is all about. There is nothing on the moon worth going back to, this is the cold hard truth.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Taking the space elevator thing seriously, how on earth would you deploy the cable?
Originally posted by NWguy83
Originally posted by Frosty
I can't believe Micheal Griffin has made it this easy for some of you to buy into Bush's political goal. This is propoganda people, such as it was the first time. Let's get to the moon first before the commies do. That's what this is all about. There is nothing on the moon worth going back to, this is the cold hard truth.
'Propaganda', you know that if it were Kerry's or Gore's plan you'd be 100% for it... And 'political goal'?! Bush isn't trying to get re-elected anymore. Welcome to 2005 Frosty. Helium 3, trying to live there to see if it can be done on Mars, where there might be better things than Helium 3.
That is an insane amount of dirt to bring back, it would take thousands of trips to bring a suffecient amount of this material back to earth costing in the trillions. What would be the point of this especially when there are no Helium-3 reactors?
200 million tonnes of lunar soil would produce one tonne of helium.
alt-e.blogspot.com...
Originally posted by snafu7700
sorry, i dont know why it wont hyperlink....but it will work cut and paste.
Originally posted by Mizar
I wouldn't say they were mistakes. I would say they are unwise decisions.
Originally posted by Murcielago
I bit back I found a site that describes the whole process is great detail...I should have found it by tomorrow.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Originally posted by Murcielago
I bit back I found a site that describes the whole process is great detail...I should have found it by tomorrow.
Nah, don't panic, just as long as someone has figured it out!
HAL9000
it will be 10 times cheaper to deploy something into orbit.
Originally posted by NWguy83
Space elevator is proposed to be 62,000 miles high. They've even said that it would take one of those climbing lifts an entire week to go that high. Sure it's a nice CONCEPT, but we'll just see how plausible it is in real life. Nuclear powered aircraft anyone?