It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Rights of Women in Iraq?

page: 1

log in


posted on Aug, 24 2005 @ 01:40 AM
I was reading this latest transcript from an interview with George Bush and it got me to thinking....

Q Sorry about that. Does the administration's goal -- I'll ask you about the Iraqi constitution. You said you're confident that it will honor the rights of women.


Q If it's rooted in Islam, as it seems it will be, is that still -- is there still the possibility of honoring the rights of women?

THE PRESIDENT: I talked to Condi, and there is not -- as I understand it, the way the constitution is written is that women have got rights, inherent rights recognized in the constitution, and that the constitution talks about not "the religion," but "a religion." Twenty-five percent of the assembly is going to be women, which is a -- is embedded in the constitution.

Well it got me to wondering, what is going to happen there with this issue?

I would like to comment, but I have no clue myself...

posted on Sep, 24 2005 @ 09:07 PM
Another great Dulcimer thread, only me posting in it. Anyways, here is an update:

Women's rights activists in
Iraq say rising extremism is restricting their freedom, even as the country prepares to vote on a constitution that is touted as one of the Arab world's most progressive regarding women.

"Women cannot walk freely out in the street," said activist Ban Jamil, who directs the Rasafa Branch of Assyrian Women Union, a local non-governmental organisation in Baghdad.

"Women face lack of respect when they walk uncovered," said Jamil, a Christian, who said women are insulted if they show too much skin or walk in public without wearing the Islamic veil, or hijab, to cover their hair.

She blamed "imported extremist doctrines, which were never experienced in the past" for the new restrictions.

The tide of Islamisation has risen in Iraq as fundamentalist Shiite parties have come to power following the ouster of former dictator
Saddam Hussein.

I guess its only a matter of time in seeing what really comes out of this.

posted on Sep, 24 2005 @ 09:43 PM
Yes it is very sad that women has gone backward in their freedoms since liberation.

Saddam was not a "Religious man" one of the ways to keep the people oppress was limiting their worship specially for the Islamic groups.

He kept cleric leaders on house arrest to be able to control them.

Women had more liberties during Saddam, they didn't had to cover if they didn't want to and it was not up to their religious leaders to chose.

They were able to work also, under the Islamic rule the role of women will be very limited.

new topics

log in