It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war. And I don't think any oil shipments will stop. But this man is a terrific danger and the United ... This is in our sphere of influence, so we can't let this happen. We have the Monroe Doctrine, we have other doctrines that we have announced. And without question, this is a dangerous enemy to our south, controlling a huge pool of oil, that could hurt us very badly. We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. We don't need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator. It's a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
One could say that Pat Robertson is just the same as the other religious fanatics that started this war on terror.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Uh, I don't hear any complaints about Chavez's work at causing insatbility in the Central American region, and nobody cries one tear over the fact that he supports the continued Communistic attack against Colombia.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Robertson did not call for the death of a Supreme Court member, you are misquoting him, LDF.
I don't believe it is the same thing as Imams and Mullahs calling for the heads of Americans wherever they are found, no is it? No, it isn't.
Roberston is also speaking on behalf of himself, not on behalf of God, nor is he suggesting that in doing this, the assassin would be guarranteed a place in heaven with a few dozen tramps and an endless supply of rot-gut!
Originally posted by worldwatcher
while Robertson may not be speaking for God in that one case, he does claim to be a representative of the Christian God and is a leader of people, many who do give his words credence. He should know better than to say stuff like that.
And no assassinating Chavez is not a good idea, regardless of who is thinking it. Don't you realize we're creating another Fidel through stupid policy and rhetoric. We should be doing whatever we can to build on relations with Venezuela not alienate them into becoming our enemies.
Robertson has made controversial statements in the past. In October 2003, he suggested that the State Department be blown up with a nuclear device. He has also said that feminism encourages women to "kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians."
Originally posted by worldwatcher
I can't believe the things that come out of this man's mouth sometimes. For a good Christian he seems to enjoy praying for death and suffering of others. How would we react if another religious cleric was to call for the assassination of our president???
Originally posted by Amuk
Roberston is also speaking on behalf of himself, not on behalf of God, nor is he suggesting that in doing this, the assassin would be guarranteed a place in heaven with a few dozen tramps and an endless supply of rot-gut!
Now we are talking
Wheres Venezuela?????