It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eudaimonia
Those references are masons. A little bias, wouldn't you say? Of coure they will reject!
Originally posted by suzy ryan
I've repeatedly refered readers to Neonhelet's post on the second page of Eudaimonia's thread, about Masonic government and organized child abuse rings. It is a very lengthy post about how hard it is to get justice for victims of organized child sexual abuse in Australia. My 'evidence' (which Neonhelmet posted, thank muchly to Neonhelmet) is in that post and I don't think I should waste folks time repeating it.
Originally posted by senrak
Originally posted by suzy ryan
Could it be that this isn't a site to discuss conspiracies but to CLOSE DOWN ANY talk of ANY conspiracies that include ANY masons?
Darn it guys! Ol' Suze figured it out.
Oh well, Suze, it's been fun, but I guess you can go away now, huh?
By the way....no "c" in Senrak. That wouldn't make sense at all.
Thanks for playing.
[edit on 16-8-2005 by senrak] [/quote
Carefull Senrak, some may take that as an addmission and I suppose a typeo now makes me eternally discredited with you. If thats how you judge who's opinion is worth giving some thought to no wonder you can spout that all is right with the masonic world garbage.
Originally posted by suzy ryan
Carefull Senrak, some may take that as an addmission and I suppose a typeo now makes me eternally discredited with you. If thats how you judge who's opinion is worth giving some thought to no wonder you can spout that all is right with the masonic world garbage.
Originally posted by sebatwerk
What's the point of this thread? Eudamonia constantly complains about all the masonic threads, but he's the one creating most of them!
This is pathetic, and so are the trolls. This thread is nothing but a troll for a reaction. Brethren, for the first time in my life here on ATS I will recommend to you all to ignore this thread, and the troll that started it.
They should be expelled if that's true.
Originally posted by suzy ryan
O.K. senrack (sorry typo again, Senrak) Some masons, as well as others, have been and are involved in ritual child abuse.
"help" them do what? Get away with it? Horse s***! PROVE That. I challenge you.
Masons will and do help other masons accussed of these practices if man's faulty legal system can't "prove" their guilt.
Providing more charactor references for the accussed than for the victim can and does sway a jury. Is that what you want me to share with all readers? Proof and truth are two very different things and it's the difference that makes justice so hard to come by.
Originally posted by eudaimonia
Funny how quickly you want others to ignore me as soon as suzy had posted this incredible revelation:
Some masons, as well as others, have been and are involved in ritual child abuse. Masons will and do help other masons accussed of these practices if man's faulty legal system can't "prove" their guilt. Providing more charactor references for the accussed than for the victim can and does sway a jury. Is that what you want me to share with all readers? Proof and truth are two very different things and it's the difference that makes justice so hard to come by.
Nobody needs to do a damn thing just because you "say so". What authority do YOU have over people's actions?
Originally posted by suzy ryan
Some masons, as well as others, have been and are involved in ritual child abuse. Masons will and do help other masons accussed of these practices if man's faulty legal system can't "prove" their guilt. Providing more charactor references for the accussed than for the victim can and does sway a jury. Is that what you want me to share with all readers? Proof and truth are two very different things and it's the difference that makes justice so hard to come by.
Originally posted by suzy ryan
Golfie, the thread is about Masory and secret societies.
The problem with getting justice when secret societies are involved is that "independant" investigators, judicary, doctors etc. who can and do have 'secret' connections are held up credible because of an independance that doesn't infact exist but because of secrecy can't be 'proven' to the satisfaction of the 'law', that they are so heavily invested in.
Again, we are talking about CONSIRACIES on this CONSPIRACY site. I don't single out masons, I just get vilified for INCLUDING them in discussions of CONSPIRACY and INJUSTICE.
I don't have a problem with ALL masons as I don't have a problem with ALL Catholics (despite 8 of our priests who got sacked for crimes against children going to the last Pope and getting their jobs back) I don't have a problem with ALL of ANY group but I do have a problem with ANY group that wants do shut down GENUINE inquiry about them because they want the whole world to believe they are ALL benevolent sweetness and light.
Readers should be able to post their opinions, as opinions, without being vilified. If you disagree, do so without calling the charactor of those you disagree with into question AS YOUR ARGUMENT against THE ISSUE being discussed.
Originally posted by suzy ryan
Masons on this site quickly jump to 'attack' anyone who may be 'perceived' by them, to be anti-mason. We respond to the attack then get accussed of mason bashing. Give us all a break and let the THE TOPIC BE THE ISSUE NOT THE TOPIC KILLING DEMAND THAT ALL MASONS BE BELIEVED AND TRUSTED AS ONLY BEING GOOD.
Masons will and do help other masons accussed of these practices if man's faulty legal system can't "prove" their guilt.